Does supine versus lateral position affect operative time and reduction quality for elderly intertrochanteric femur fractures?

To compare operative time, reduction quality, and implant placement between supine and lateral decubitus positions for cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. A retrospective review was conducted of patients aged ≥ 60 years with intertrochanteric fractures treated with CMN at a Level I trauma center over one year. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and operative details were recorded. Procedures were performed on either a traction table or flat-top table. The primary outcome was total operating room (OR) time. Secondary outcomes included setup time, surgical time, reduction grade, tip-apex distance, implant placement, blood loss, fluoroscopic exposure time, fluoroscopic radiation dose, and postoperative complications. 54 patients positioned supine and 29 positioned lateral decubitus were included. No differences were observed between groups regarding patient and injury characteristics, including operating table type (p > 0.05). Lateral group, compared to supine group, had significantly greater total OR time (218.2 ± 60.8 vs. 162.8 ± 45.4 min, p < 0.001), setup time (90.9 ± 21.5 vs. 64.1 ± 21.2 min, p < 0.001), surgical time (114.5 ± 43.4 vs. 85.8 ± 33.4 min, p < 0.001), and fluoroscopic radiation dose (13.5 ± 13.8 vs. 6.1 ± 3.7 Gy·cm2, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in reduction grade, implant placement measures, blood loss, fluoroscopy time, or postoperative complications (p > 0.05). On multivariate regression, lateral positioning was significantly associated with increased total OR time (β = 42.17, p = 0.004), setup time (β = 21.55, p < 0.001), surgical time (β = 21.18, p = 0.040), and radiation dose (β = 6.37, p = 0.009). Supine positioning for CMN of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients was associated with shorter operative time compared to lateral positioning, with no difference in reduction quality or implant placement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-026-04739-5
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does supine versus lateral position affect operative time and reduction quality for elderly intertrochanteric femur fractures?

Joshua L. Gary, J Lee, Ryan C. Ross, Soroush Shabani et al.
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Does supine versus lateral position affect operative time and reduction quality for elderly intertrochanteric femur fractures?

Joshua L. Gary, J Lee, Ryan C. Ross, Soroush Shabani, Brandan Sakka, Jorge Figueras, Joseph T. Patterson, Michael Allen, Lane Shepherd, Charalampos Zalavras
article en

Abstract

To compare operative time, reduction quality, and implant placement between supine and lateral decubitus positions for cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. A retrospective review was conducted of patients aged ≥ 60 years with intertrochanteric fractures treated with CMN at a Level I trauma center over one year. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and operative details were recorded. Procedures were performed on either a traction table or flat-top table. The primary outcome was total operating room (OR) time. Secondary outcomes included setup time, surgical time, reduction grade, tip-apex distance, implant placement, blood loss, fluoroscopic exposure time, fluoroscopic radiation dose, and postoperative complications. 54 patients positioned supine and 29 positioned lateral decubitus were included. No differences were observed between groups regarding patient and injury characteristics, including operating table type (p > 0.05). Lateral group, compared to supine group, had significantly greater total OR time (218.2 ± 60.8 vs. 162.8 ± 45.4 min, p < 0.001), setup time (90.9 ± 21.5 vs. 64.1 ± 21.2 min, p < 0.001), surgical time (114.5 ± 43.4 vs. 85.8 ± 33.4 min, p < 0.001), and fluoroscopic radiation dose (13.5 ± 13.8 vs. 6.1 ± 3.7 Gy·cm2, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in reduction grade, implant placement measures, blood loss, fluoroscopy time, or postoperative complications (p > 0.05). On multivariate regression, lateral positioning was significantly associated with increased total OR time (β = 42.17, p = 0.004), setup time (β = 21.55, p < 0.001), surgical time (β = 21.18, p = 0.040), and radiation dose (β = 6.37, p = 0.009). Supine positioning for CMN of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients was associated with shorter operative time compared to lateral positioning, with no difference in reduction quality or implant placement.

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & TraumatologyVol. 36(1)
University of Southern California (US), California State University, Fresno (US)
University of Southern California
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.