Causal effect estimates of online e-cigarette marketing exposure on future e-cigarette harm perception and use

Background: Globally, over 10 million youth use e-cigarettes; United States use, in particular, dramatically rose in the late 2010's, exceeding year-over-year increases from any other substance in over four decades. This rise has been partially attributed to youth online e-cigarette marketing exposure, but has not been appropriately studied. Methods: We examined youth data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) spanning the dramatic increase period (Waves 4, 4.5, and 5; 2016-2019). We estimated average risk differences (RD) for Wave 5 e-cigarette harmfulness perception and use comparing all youth versus no youth reporting past-month online e-cigarette marketing exposure in Waves 4 and 4.5. We used a doubly robust, nonparametric targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE) to estimate RD, incorporating PATH survey weights. Initial analyses adjusted for demographics, mental health issues, and other forms of e-cigarette marketing. Subsequent analyses adjusted for frequency of social media use, other substance use, and tobacco (non-e-cigarette) use. Results: Initial analyses estimated that online marketing was associated with a 9% decrease in e-cigarette harmfulness perception (RD=-0.09, 95% C=-0.12, -0.05), or a Risk Ratio (RR) of 0.85 (95% CI=0.80, 0.91), as well as a 4% increase in current e-cigarette use (RD=0.04, 95% CI=0.02, 0.06; RR=1.36, 95% CI=1.15, 1.62). However, after adjusting for additional potential time-varying confounding variables, point estimates were close to null with 95% confidence intervals spanning the null. Discussion: Frequency of social media use, other substance use, and/or tobacco use may be important confounding variables related to marketing and e-cigarette use that require further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadr.2026.100436
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Causal effect estimates of online e-cigarette marketing exposure on future e-cigarette harm perception and use

Nicholas Williams, Nicole Rychagov, Sílvia S. Martins, Rachel Ayala Guzman et al.
Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Causal effect estimates of online e-cigarette marketing exposure on future e-cigarette harm perception and use

Nicholas Williams, Nicole Rychagov, Sílvia S. Martins, Rachel Ayala Guzman, Kara E. Rudolph, Paul T. Harrell, Ateeqa Ijaz, Aaron Null
article en

Abstract

Background: Globally, over 10 million youth use e-cigarettes; United States use, in particular, dramatically rose in the late 2010's, exceeding year-over-year increases from any other substance in over four decades. This rise has been partially attributed to youth online e-cigarette marketing exposure, but has not been appropriately studied. Methods: We examined youth data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) spanning the dramatic increase period (Waves 4, 4.5, and 5; 2016-2019). We estimated average risk differences (RD) for Wave 5 e-cigarette harmfulness perception and use comparing all youth versus no youth reporting past-month online e-cigarette marketing exposure in Waves 4 and 4.5. We used a doubly robust, nonparametric targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE) to estimate RD, incorporating PATH survey weights. Initial analyses adjusted for demographics, mental health issues, and other forms of e-cigarette marketing. Subsequent analyses adjusted for frequency of social media use, other substance use, and tobacco (non-e-cigarette) use. Results: Initial analyses estimated that online marketing was associated with a 9% decrease in e-cigarette harmfulness perception (RD=-0.09, 95% C=-0.12, -0.05), or a Risk Ratio (RR) of 0.85 (95% CI=0.80, 0.91), as well as a 4% increase in current e-cigarette use (RD=0.04, 95% CI=0.02, 0.06; RR=1.36, 95% CI=1.15, 1.62). However, after adjusting for additional potential time-varying confounding variables, point estimates were close to null with 95% confidence intervals spanning the null. Discussion: Frequency of social media use, other substance use, and/or tobacco use may be important confounding variables related to marketing and e-cigarette use that require further investigation.

Drug and Alcohol Dependence ReportsVol. 19
Columbia University (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Virginia Foundation for Healthy Youth, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.