Understanding as Designed Projection

Computational models can predict and generalize while leaving mechanistic questions unanswered. In their recent commentary, Shiffrin et al. argue that this gap gives rise to “illusions of understanding” in sciences, particularly when successful inference is treated as explanation. In this commentary, I focus on one source of such illusions emphasized by the authors: the difficulty of deduction. The authors propose that such illusions arise because deductions, even when correctly formalized, are often difficult to understand in probabilistic, chaotic, or high-dimensional system. Here I reconsider this conclusion by arguing that this limitation is better understood as a consequence of a designed projection under partial observability. Scientific measurement relies on compressing complex phenomena through experimental design, creating an information bottleneck. From an information-theoretic perspective, no analysis can recover structure that was never measured. Drawing on recent work on epiplexity, I further argue that understanding emerges from the extraction of learnable structure from data, shaped by both data collection and analysis choices. In this view, scientific progress is driven by improving and switching projection spaces through new measurements, task designs, and models that make previously inaccessible structure learnable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Brain & Behavior
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-026-00299-3
Primary Topic
Crafts, Textile, and Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding as Designed Projection

Yinqi Huang
Computational Brain & Behavior
Crafts, Textile, and Design
article

Understanding as Designed Projection

Yinqi Huang
article en

Abstract

Computational models can predict and generalize while leaving mechanistic questions unanswered. In their recent commentary, Shiffrin et al. argue that this gap gives rise to “illusions of understanding” in sciences, particularly when successful inference is treated as explanation. In this commentary, I focus on one source of such illusions emphasized by the authors: the difficulty of deduction. The authors propose that such illusions arise because deductions, even when correctly formalized, are often difficult to understand in probabilistic, chaotic, or high-dimensional system. Here I reconsider this conclusion by arguing that this limitation is better understood as a consequence of a designed projection under partial observability. Scientific measurement relies on compressing complex phenomena through experimental design, creating an information bottleneck. From an information-theoretic perspective, no analysis can recover structure that was never measured. Drawing on recent work on epiplexity, I further argue that understanding emerges from the extraction of learnable structure from data, shaped by both data collection and analysis choices. In this view, scientific progress is driven by improving and switching projection spaces through new measurements, task designs, and models that make previously inaccessible structure learnable.

Computational Brain & Behavior
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Crafts, Textile, and Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.