Long‐Term Voice Outcomes After Trans‐Oral Resection of Early Glottis Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: Survival after trans-oral laser microsurgery (TLM) for glottic carcinoma is excellent. However, the voice quality after TLM remains unclear. This study examines voice outcomes following different surgical procedures. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of voice outcomes (GRBAS, VHI-10, CSID scores) after TLM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing TLM were studied. We collected the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10), acoustic analysis (Cepstral Spectral Peak Prominence, CSPP score), and GRBAS rating score. These data were correlated with cancer stage and ELS (surgery type). RESULTS: We studied 102 patients (86 males, 16 females; median age 74). There were 51 type I and 27 type Va resections. The rest underwent types II, III, IV, Vb, VI, and open vertical hemilaryngectomy surgery. The median follow-up time was 5.2 years. The median VHI-10 score was 7.5 (normal < 10). The median CSID score was 27.5 (mild = 20-40). The Average GRBAS score was G1.5, R1, B1, A0, S1.5 (mild = 1, moderate = 2). There was a correlation between the CSID score and the type of cordectomy and surgical stage. There was a statistical difference in Type I ELR resection outcomes compared with all other types in voice outcome (Cohen's d-value > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Patients often rate their VHI as normal, while objective and perceptual raters rate voices after TLM as showing mild to moderate dysphonia. This low VHI score may be due to cancer survivorship. Understanding the patient experience after TLM surgery and knowing the extent of surgery on voice outcomes can help better counsel patients undergoing TLM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70561
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long‐Term Voice Outcomes After Trans‐Oral Resection of Early Glottis Carcinoma

Benjamin M. Laitman, Peak Woo, Anahita Nourmahnad
The Laryngoscope
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Long‐Term Voice Outcomes After Trans‐Oral Resection of Early Glottis Carcinoma

Benjamin M. Laitman, Peak Woo, Anahita Nourmahnad
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Survival after trans-oral laser microsurgery (TLM) for glottic carcinoma is excellent. However, the voice quality after TLM remains unclear. This study examines voice outcomes following different surgical procedures. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of voice outcomes (GRBAS, VHI-10, CSID scores) after TLM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing TLM were studied. We collected the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10), acoustic analysis (Cepstral Spectral Peak Prominence, CSPP score), and GRBAS rating score. These data were correlated with cancer stage and ELS (surgery type). RESULTS: We studied 102 patients (86 males, 16 females; median age 74). There were 51 type I and 27 type Va resections. The rest underwent types II, III, IV, Vb, VI, and open vertical hemilaryngectomy surgery. The median follow-up time was 5.2 years. The median VHI-10 score was 7.5 (normal < 10). The median CSID score was 27.5 (mild = 20-40). The Average GRBAS score was G1.5, R1, B1, A0, S1.5 (mild = 1, moderate = 2). There was a correlation between the CSID score and the type of cordectomy and surgical stage. There was a statistical difference in Type I ELR resection outcomes compared with all other types in voice outcome (Cohen's d-value > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Patients often rate their VHI as normal, while objective and perceptual raters rate voices after TLM as showing mild to moderate dysphonia. This low VHI score may be due to cancer survivorship. Understanding the patient experience after TLM surgery and knowing the extent of surgery on voice outcomes can help better counsel patients undergoing TLM.

The Laryngoscope
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.