Accounting for Socialization: Quantitative Priming, Language, and Tools in a Masters of Public Affairs Program

Quantitative accountability has become a widespread rationale for how organizations ought to operate in the twenty-first century. However, we know little about how the people who craft and implement such policies learn this rationale. How do future policy professionals learn quantitative accountability? How do the people responsible for organizational accountability learn it, and learn to do it? To answer these questions, we draw from a two-year ethnography of a cohort of students at a highly regarded Masters of Public Affairs (MPA) program. We find that, instead of directly debating forms of organizational control such as accountability, students learn accountability indirectly through an emphasis on the quantitative techniques that facilitate accountability. MPA students are primed into a quantitative view of their future careers, acquire quantitative “language” and “tools,” and are socialized into accountability in ways that are both tacit and tangible, even as the appropriateness of accountability itself is largely unquestioned.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416261434927
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting for Socialization: Quantitative Priming, Language, and Tools in a Masters of Public Affairs Program

Matthew Gougherty
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Accounting for Socialization: Quantitative Priming, Language, and Tools in a Masters of Public Affairs Program

Matthew Gougherty
article en

Abstract

Quantitative accountability has become a widespread rationale for how organizations ought to operate in the twenty-first century. However, we know little about how the people who craft and implement such policies learn this rationale. How do future policy professionals learn quantitative accountability? How do the people responsible for organizational accountability learn it, and learn to do it? To answer these questions, we draw from a two-year ethnography of a cohort of students at a highly regarded Masters of Public Affairs (MPA) program. We find that, instead of directly debating forms of organizational control such as accountability, students learn accountability indirectly through an emphasis on the quantitative techniques that facilitate accountability. MPA students are primed into a quantitative view of their future careers, acquire quantitative “language” and “tools,” and are socialized into accountability in ways that are both tacit and tangible, even as the appropriateness of accountability itself is largely unquestioned.

Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
University of Notre Dame (US), Eastern Oregon University (US)
Spencer Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.