Duplex ultrasound-based step-by-step perforator mapping by a microsurgeon for DIEP flap planning: A prospective case series

BACKGROUND: Precise preoperative assessment and selection of optimal perforators are critical to optimize outcomes in DIEP flap microsurgical breast reconstruction (BR). Although CTA is widely used, color-coded duplex sonography (CCDS) offers a radiation-free and cost-effective alternative. This study presents a standardized step-by-step protocol for duplex-based perforator mapping and evaluates its application in a prospective case series. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral DIEP flaps BR between January 2022 and January 2025. All patients received preoperative CCDS mapping to identify the dominant perforator. Variables recorded included number, location, size, and flow characteristics of perforators, flap weight, and flap-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 62 flaps were performed. The average number of perforators identified per flap was 3.19 (SD: 1.39), with a mean of 1.35 (SD: 0.54) perforators harvested. The mapped dominant perforator matched the intraoperative finding in 50/62 cases (80.64%), with agreement being statistically higher in unilateral flaps than in bilateral flaps (88.63% vs. 61.11%; p=0.018). The choice of perforator row was statistically different between the unilateral and bilateral flaps (p=0.045), with 70.4% of medial row in unilateral and 55.5% of lateral row in bilateral flaps. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 flaps (9.68%): fat necrosis (n=3), partial flap necrosis (n=2), and total flap loss (n=1). CONCLUSION: Using our step-by-step approach, preoperative CCDS is known to be a reliable, reproducible, and non-invasive tool for assessing perforators in DIEP flap reconstruction. This examination may represent a feasible, radiation-free adjunct that can be performed directly by the microsurgeon preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2026.04.005
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Duplex ultrasound-based step-by-step perforator mapping by a microsurgeon for DIEP flap planning: A prospective case series

Martina Giacalone, Simone La Padula, Benedetto Longo, Alessio Farcomeni et al.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Duplex ultrasound-based step-by-step perforator mapping by a microsurgeon for DIEP flap planning: A prospective case series

Martina Giacalone, Simone La Padula, Benedetto Longo, Alessio Farcomeni, Gennaro D’Orsi, Valerio Cervelli
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Precise preoperative assessment and selection of optimal perforators are critical to optimize outcomes in DIEP flap microsurgical breast reconstruction (BR). Although CTA is widely used, color-coded duplex sonography (CCDS) offers a radiation-free and cost-effective alternative. This study presents a standardized step-by-step protocol for duplex-based perforator mapping and evaluates its application in a prospective case series. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral DIEP flaps BR between January 2022 and January 2025. All patients received preoperative CCDS mapping to identify the dominant perforator. Variables recorded included number, location, size, and flow characteristics of perforators, flap weight, and flap-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 62 flaps were performed. The average number of perforators identified per flap was 3.19 (SD: 1.39), with a mean of 1.35 (SD: 0.54) perforators harvested. The mapped dominant perforator matched the intraoperative finding in 50/62 cases (80.64%), with agreement being statistically higher in unilateral flaps than in bilateral flaps (88.63% vs. 61.11%; p=0.018). The choice of perforator row was statistically different between the unilateral and bilateral flaps (p=0.045), with 70.4% of medial row in unilateral and 55.5% of lateral row in bilateral flaps. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 flaps (9.68%): fat necrosis (n=3), partial flap necrosis (n=2), and total flap loss (n=1). CONCLUSION: Using our step-by-step approach, preoperative CCDS is known to be a reliable, reproducible, and non-invasive tool for assessing perforators in DIEP flap reconstruction. This examination may represent a feasible, radiation-free adjunct that can be performed directly by the microsurgeon preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic SurgeryVol. 117
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.