From coercion to commitment: a process model on forging a committed core in a buyer–supplier partnership

Purpose This study investigates the dynamic process by which an inter-organizational relationship, initially triggered by coercive power, transforms into a committed partnership. It specifically examines how the relationship survives the withdrawal of external incentives. Design/methodology/approach Adopting a process theory perspective, we employed a longitudinal single case study of a buyer-supplier safety initiative, the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH Family), in a state-owned enterprise. Data collected over 28 months, including in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and archival records, were analyzed using process tracing to identify causal mechanisms. Findings The analysis reveals a three-stage evolutionary model: (1) Power-Driven Compulsory Compliance, (2) Platform-Incubated Learning and Trust-Building, and (3) Crisis-Catalyzed Relational Transformation. Crucially, the study finds that an external crisis acted as a “sorting mechanism,” distinguishing partners who had internalized shared values from those who merely complied, forging a committed core. Originality/value Relative to the IMP tradition and process studies of inter-organizational relationships that emphasize gradual, interaction-driven evolution, this study uncovers a crisis-triggered, non-linear pathway through which a coercion-initiated partnership survives the withdrawal of external incentives by fracturing into a committed core and a more skeptical periphery. Building on but extending prior work on power, crisis, learning, and trust, the study uses process tracing to unpack how coercive power, a deliberately designed inter-organizational learning platform, and an external shock are sequentially coupled into a mechanism that transforms superficial compliance into double-loop learning and value internalization. Furthermore, it advances research on relational value by proposing the Return on Partnership Investment (ROPI) framework, which operationalizes partnership benefits as distinct relational dividends – Resilience, Innovation, and Governance – rather than a single, aggregate performance outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Change Management
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-09-2025-0804
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From coercion to commitment: a process model on forging a committed core in a buyer–supplier partnership

Jen‐Yao Lee, C T Chen, Chien-Hung Chen, Zhao-Hong Cheng
Journal of Organizational Change Management
Management and Organizational Studies
article

From coercion to commitment: a process model on forging a committed core in a buyer–supplier partnership

Jen‐Yao Lee, C T Chen, Chien-Hung Chen, Zhao-Hong Cheng
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the dynamic process by which an inter-organizational relationship, initially triggered by coercive power, transforms into a committed partnership. It specifically examines how the relationship survives the withdrawal of external incentives. Design/methodology/approach Adopting a process theory perspective, we employed a longitudinal single case study of a buyer-supplier safety initiative, the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH Family), in a state-owned enterprise. Data collected over 28 months, including in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and archival records, were analyzed using process tracing to identify causal mechanisms. Findings The analysis reveals a three-stage evolutionary model: (1) Power-Driven Compulsory Compliance, (2) Platform-Incubated Learning and Trust-Building, and (3) Crisis-Catalyzed Relational Transformation. Crucially, the study finds that an external crisis acted as a “sorting mechanism,” distinguishing partners who had internalized shared values from those who merely complied, forging a committed core. Originality/value Relative to the IMP tradition and process studies of inter-organizational relationships that emphasize gradual, interaction-driven evolution, this study uncovers a crisis-triggered, non-linear pathway through which a coercion-initiated partnership survives the withdrawal of external incentives by fracturing into a committed core and a more skeptical periphery. Building on but extending prior work on power, crisis, learning, and trust, the study uses process tracing to unpack how coercive power, a deliberately designed inter-organizational learning platform, and an external shock are sequentially coupled into a mechanism that transforms superficial compliance into double-loop learning and value internalization. Furthermore, it advances research on relational value by proposing the Return on Partnership Investment (ROPI) framework, which operationalizes partnership benefits as distinct relational dividends – Resilience, Innovation, and Governance – rather than a single, aggregate performance outcome.

Journal of Organizational Change Management
National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology (TW), University of Science and Technology (YE), National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology (TW)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.