Seven deadly sins in artificial intelligence for digital medicine

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in clinical environments, raising questions of trust, fairness, empathy, and governance. The ethical terrain surrounding AI in medicine remains unstable despite its rapid adoption. We introduce the "Seven Deadly Sins of AI in Medicine", a conceptual framework of recurring systemic failure modes: (i) Blind Trust, (ii) Overregulation, (iii) Dehumanization, (iv) Misaligned Optimization, (v) Overinforming and False Forecasting, (vi) Misapplied Statistics, and (vii) Self-Referential Evaluation. The framework was developed through systematic synthesis of scientific literature, clinical guidelines, and regulatory frameworks prior to any empirical data collection. To validate this pre-established framework, we conducted a global, cross-professional opinion poll of 914 stakeholders from 143 countries between July 2024 and March 2025. Results confirmed broad agreement with each pre-identified risk, revealing cross-cultural convergence in ethical concern alongside persistent divides in attitudes toward regulation-particularly between technologically advanced nations and emerging economies. We further propose an inversion of the framework into seven cardinal virtues for AI in medicine, offering actionable principles to guide responsible development and governance. The goal is to move beyond scattered ethical guidelines toward a unified diagnostic tool for trustworthy, human-centered medical AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02607-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seven deadly sins in artificial intelligence for digital medicine

Igor Jurišica, Heimo Müller, Vimla L. Patel, Edward H. Shortliffe et al.
1 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
12.47
article

Seven deadly sins in artificial intelligence for digital medicine

Igor Jurišica, Heimo Müller, Vimla L. Patel, Edward H. Shortliffe, Andreas Holzinger
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in clinical environments, raising questions of trust, fairness, empathy, and governance. The ethical terrain surrounding AI in medicine remains unstable despite its rapid adoption. We introduce the "Seven Deadly Sins of AI in Medicine", a conceptual framework of recurring systemic failure modes: (i) Blind Trust, (ii) Overregulation, (iii) Dehumanization, (iv) Misaligned Optimization, (v) Overinforming and False Forecasting, (vi) Misapplied Statistics, and (vii) Self-Referential Evaluation. The framework was developed through systematic synthesis of scientific literature, clinical guidelines, and regulatory frameworks prior to any empirical data collection. To validate this pre-established framework, we conducted a global, cross-professional opinion poll of 914 stakeholders from 143 countries between July 2024 and March 2025. Results confirmed broad agreement with each pre-identified risk, revealing cross-cultural convergence in ethical concern alongside persistent divides in attitudes toward regulation-particularly between technologically advanced nations and emerging economies. We further propose an inversion of the framework into seven cardinal virtues for AI in medicine, offering actionable principles to guide responsible development and governance. The goal is to move beyond scattered ethical guidelines toward a unified diagnostic tool for trustworthy, human-centered medical AI.

npj Digital Medicine
New York Academy of Medicine (US), Medical University of Graz (AT), Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (AE), Machine Science (US), Krembil Research Institute, Columbia University (US), BOKU University (AT)
Austrian Science Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
12.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.