Protocol for the process evaluation of a mobile produce market intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in lower-income communities: the Veggie Van Study

Introduction: Mobile produce markets have become increasingly prevalent throughout the United States, highlighting the need for evidence-based models for markets to follow. The Veggie Van (VV) model is a set of practices that have been found to be efficacious in increasing fruit and vegetable intake in underserved communities. The next step in determining the model's effectiveness is evaluating the model when implemented on a broader scale under real-world conditions. As part of a multi-state randomized controlled effectiveness trial, the Veggie Van Study, an extensive process evaluation of the implementation of the VV model was conducted. Methods: Nine partner organizations agreed to implement the VV model at newly launched mobile markets over a 12-month period. Organizations received funding, training, and technical assistance to support implementation of the model. In addition to facilitating participant recruitment and data collection, partners agreed to participate in implementation-related data collection. Data collection methods include quantitative process measures surveys, qualitative interviews, and mobile market sales data. The main process outcomes are fidelity, dose delivered, penetration, maintenance of the VV model, and contextual factors related to implementation. Discussion: This extensive mixed-methods process evaluation addresses a gap in the literature for transparent reporting of process evaluations; it also provides a model for similar community-based interventions to follow. Understanding the implementation process and the context surrounding implementation of the VV model is critical for interpreting effectiveness findings (i.e., dietary changes) and optimizing the intervention. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04246593, NCT04246593.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1760383
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protocol for the process evaluation of a mobile produce market intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in lower-income communities: the Veggie Van Study

A Ammerman, Lucia A. Leone, Christina Kasprzak, Leah N. Vermont et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Protocol for the process evaluation of a mobile produce market intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in lower-income communities: the Veggie Van Study

A Ammerman, Lucia A. Leone, Christina Kasprzak, Leah N. Vermont, Lindsey Haynes‐Maslow, Samina Raja, Anne Lally, Andy Canizares, Laurene Tumiel-Berhalter
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Mobile produce markets have become increasingly prevalent throughout the United States, highlighting the need for evidence-based models for markets to follow. The Veggie Van (VV) model is a set of practices that have been found to be efficacious in increasing fruit and vegetable intake in underserved communities. The next step in determining the model's effectiveness is evaluating the model when implemented on a broader scale under real-world conditions. As part of a multi-state randomized controlled effectiveness trial, the Veggie Van Study, an extensive process evaluation of the implementation of the VV model was conducted. Methods: Nine partner organizations agreed to implement the VV model at newly launched mobile markets over a 12-month period. Organizations received funding, training, and technical assistance to support implementation of the model. In addition to facilitating participant recruitment and data collection, partners agreed to participate in implementation-related data collection. Data collection methods include quantitative process measures surveys, qualitative interviews, and mobile market sales data. The main process outcomes are fidelity, dose delivered, penetration, maintenance of the VV model, and contextual factors related to implementation. Discussion: This extensive mixed-methods process evaluation addresses a gap in the literature for transparent reporting of process evaluations; it also provides a model for similar community-based interventions to follow. Understanding the implementation process and the context surrounding implementation of the VV model is critical for interpreting effectiveness findings (i.e., dietary changes) and optimizing the intervention. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04246593, NCT04246593.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.