Patient- and provider-level determinants of self-assessed health and well-being among adults with chronic conditions in Slovenian primary care

Chronic diseases significantly impact patients’ quality of life and healthcare systems. In Slovenia, understanding the factors influencing self-assessed health and well-being can support more effective primary care policies. The purpose of this study was to identify patient- and provider-level factors associated with general health and well-being among Slovenian adults with chronic conditions. This cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the OECD-led PaRIS initiative. Data were collected from 2133 patients aged ≥ 45 years with at least one chronic condition and 70 primary care providers. Well-being was measured via the WHO-5 Well-Being Index; general health was self-rated. Mixed-effects models were used to assess associations between well-being (linear mixed model for a continuous outcome) and general health (logistic mixed-effects model for a binary outcome) and sociodemographic, behavioural, and provider-level variables. General health was rated as excellent, very good, or good by 62.5% of the patients. The mean well-being score was 60.9 (SD = 20.9). The key patient-level predictors of better health and well-being were higher income (medium vs. low OR = 1.64, 95% CI [1.26, 2.15]; high vs. low OR = 2.28, 95% CI [1.62, 3.21]), regular physical activity (OR = 1.98, 95% CI [1.57, 2.50]), age and BMI. The last two were nonlinearly associated with optimal well-being near a BMI of 25 and peaking at approximately 65–69 years of age. Male sex was associated only with greater well-being, whereas employment (OR = 2.41, 95% CI [1.67, 3.50]) and higher education (OR = 1.52, 95% CI [1.17, 1.97]) were only associated with better health. Among the provider-level factors, only the public health care setting was positively associated with well-being. Surprisingly, receiving written self-management instructions more often was linked to slightly lower well-being. Observed differences in wellbeing reached clinical relevance (10 points) for age, BMI, and regular physical activity (b = 10.46, 95% CI [8.48, 12.43]). Patient-level factors were strongly associated with self-assessed health and well-being among patients with chronic conditions, whereas provider-level organisational features showed limited associations. Care in public health care settings was associated with higher well-being. These findings support the need for age- and BMI-sensitive interventions, behaviour-focused care, and socially equitable policies in chronic disease management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02538-4
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient- and provider-level determinants of self-assessed health and well-being among adults with chronic conditions in Slovenian primary care

Zalika Klemenc–Ketiš, Nena Kopčavar Guček, Nina Ružić Gorenjec, Aleksander Stepanović
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Patient- and provider-level determinants of self-assessed health and well-being among adults with chronic conditions in Slovenian primary care

Zalika Klemenc–Ketiš, Nena Kopčavar Guček, Nina Ružić Gorenjec, Aleksander Stepanović
article en

Abstract

Chronic diseases significantly impact patients’ quality of life and healthcare systems. In Slovenia, understanding the factors influencing self-assessed health and well-being can support more effective primary care policies. The purpose of this study was to identify patient- and provider-level factors associated with general health and well-being among Slovenian adults with chronic conditions. This cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the OECD-led PaRIS initiative. Data were collected from 2133 patients aged ≥ 45 years with at least one chronic condition and 70 primary care providers. Well-being was measured via the WHO-5 Well-Being Index; general health was self-rated. Mixed-effects models were used to assess associations between well-being (linear mixed model for a continuous outcome) and general health (logistic mixed-effects model for a binary outcome) and sociodemographic, behavioural, and provider-level variables. General health was rated as excellent, very good, or good by 62.5% of the patients. The mean well-being score was 60.9 (SD = 20.9). The key patient-level predictors of better health and well-being were higher income (medium vs. low OR = 1.64, 95% CI [1.26, 2.15]; high vs. low OR = 2.28, 95% CI [1.62, 3.21]), regular physical activity (OR = 1.98, 95% CI [1.57, 2.50]), age and BMI. The last two were nonlinearly associated with optimal well-being near a BMI of 25 and peaking at approximately 65–69 years of age. Male sex was associated only with greater well-being, whereas employment (OR = 2.41, 95% CI [1.67, 3.50]) and higher education (OR = 1.52, 95% CI [1.17, 1.97]) were only associated with better health. Among the provider-level factors, only the public health care setting was positively associated with well-being. Surprisingly, receiving written self-management instructions more often was linked to slightly lower well-being. Observed differences in wellbeing reached clinical relevance (10 points) for age, BMI, and regular physical activity (b = 10.46, 95% CI [8.48, 12.43]). Patient-level factors were strongly associated with self-assessed health and well-being among patients with chronic conditions, whereas provider-level organisational features showed limited associations. Care in public health care settings was associated with higher well-being. These findings support the need for age- and BMI-sensitive interventions, behaviour-focused care, and socially equitable policies in chronic disease management.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
University of Ljubljana (SI), University of Maribor (SI), Community Health Centre Ljubljana (SI)
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.