The alignment of knowledge focus during teaching preparation and AI-powered learning-by-teaching and their effects on mathematics learning outcomes in the context of high-stakes state assessments

The learning-by-teaching paradigm, particularly with AI-powered teachable agents, has shown particular promise for mathematics education. Despite this potential, it remains unclear how to best balance conceptual and procedural knowledge in this paradigm to optimize learning. This study addresses that question by examining how students' knowledge focus during two learning phases, preparing for teaching by watching instructional videos and active learning by teaching an AI-powered teachable agent, influences test performance. Specifically, we analyzed the increase in high-stakes state assessment scores over 3 months among 169 middle school students based on the knowledge focus (conceptual vs. procedural) they adopted while watching videos and subsequently teaching the AI agent. Results indicated that the effectiveness of pedagogical practices was moderated by learner preparedness. We found that average students enrolled in the regular-grade courses achieved the highest learning gains when adopting a complementary approach: watching concept-focused instructional videos followed by procedure-focused learning-by-teaching activity. On the other hand, students enrolled in the accelerated-grade courses, who served as the higher-preparedness group, showed the highest learning gains when using a consistent, concept-focused approach across both learning modalities. These findings suggest that the higher-preparedness group would benefit from instruction and practice that both emphasize conceptual knowledge. In comparison, average students would learn more effectively when teaching others in a way that complements, rather than mirrors, how they were initially taught. • For average students, learning is optimized when procedure-focused learning-by-teaching practices are complemented by concept-focused instructions that prepare them for teaching. • Learners who are better prepared academically tend to gain more learning benefits from focusing on conceptual knowledge both when teaching the AI agent and when preparing to teach. • Average students should be encouraged to teach the AI agent with a different knowledge focus than how they were originally taught to deepen their understanding of the learning materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Education
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105642
Primary Topic
Educational Leadership and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The alignment of knowledge focus during teaching preparation and AI-powered learning-by-teaching and their effects on mathematics learning outcomes in the context of high-stakes state assessments

Chenglu Li, Rui Guo, Mingjia Hu, Hai Li
Computers & Education
Educational Leadership and Innovation
article

The alignment of knowledge focus during teaching preparation and AI-powered learning-by-teaching and their effects on mathematics learning outcomes in the context of high-stakes state assessments

Chenglu Li, Rui Guo, Mingjia Hu, Hai Li
article en

Abstract

The learning-by-teaching paradigm, particularly with AI-powered teachable agents, has shown particular promise for mathematics education. Despite this potential, it remains unclear how to best balance conceptual and procedural knowledge in this paradigm to optimize learning. This study addresses that question by examining how students' knowledge focus during two learning phases, preparing for teaching by watching instructional videos and active learning by teaching an AI-powered teachable agent, influences test performance. Specifically, we analyzed the increase in high-stakes state assessment scores over 3 months among 169 middle school students based on the knowledge focus (conceptual vs. procedural) they adopted while watching videos and subsequently teaching the AI agent. Results indicated that the effectiveness of pedagogical practices was moderated by learner preparedness. We found that average students enrolled in the regular-grade courses achieved the highest learning gains when adopting a complementary approach: watching concept-focused instructional videos followed by procedure-focused learning-by-teaching activity. On the other hand, students enrolled in the accelerated-grade courses, who served as the higher-preparedness group, showed the highest learning gains when using a consistent, concept-focused approach across both learning modalities. These findings suggest that the higher-preparedness group would benefit from instruction and practice that both emphasize conceptual knowledge. In comparison, average students would learn more effectively when teaching others in a way that complements, rather than mirrors, how they were initially taught. • For average students, learning is optimized when procedure-focused learning-by-teaching practices are complemented by concept-focused instructions that prepare them for teaching. • Learners who are better prepared academically tend to gain more learning benefits from focusing on conceptual knowledge both when teaching the AI agent and when preparing to teach. • Average students should be encouraged to teach the AI agent with a different knowledge focus than how they were originally taught to deepen their understanding of the learning materials.

Computers & EducationVol. 251
University of Utah (US), University of Florida (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Florida College (US)
NewSchools Venture Fund
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Educational Leadership and Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.