Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Immunization Strategies to Protect Infants Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Germany: A Decision Modeling Study

INTRODUCTION: Germany's Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) recommends the use of monoclonal antibody nirsevimab for infants in their first respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) season; however, incorporating RSVpreF maternal vaccination may protect more infants while lowering healthcare costs. We therefore evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a complementary immunization approach comprising maternal RSVpreF vaccination during pregnancy and nirsevimab for infants not yet protected to prevent lower respiratory tract disease due to RSV (RSV-LRTD) among infants in Germany. METHODS: Clinical and economic outcomes of RSV-LRTD and the expected impact of interventions were modeled from birth to age < 1 year. Model inputs were based on German data as available. Intervention strategies included no intervention, nirsevimab alone (N-all; uptake 70%), and the complementary immunization approach (MV + N). MV + N comprised seasonally administered maternal vaccination (MV; uptake 50%) with nirsevimab (N; uptake 70%) for unprotected infants (MV + N). Nirsevimab was administered seasonally with catch-up for infants born outside the RSV season. Analyses were conducted from the societal perspective and discounted 3% annually. RESULTS: Without immunization, 70,041 cases of RSV-LRTD (hospital: 23,273, ambulatory: 46,768) and 22 deaths were projected; total RSV-attributable medical care costs were 118.6 million (M) €. With N-all, there were 39,247 cases (hospital 12,953; ambulatory 26,294) and 13 deaths; total associated costs were 311.5M € (intervention 237.2M €; medical care 66.0M €; indirect 8.4M €). Compared to N-all, MV + N prevented an additional 666 cases and 1 death, with a difference in total costs of - 17.8M € (intervention - 12.7M €; medical care - 4.7M €; indirect - 0.4M €). With 31 QALYs gained, MV + N was dominant versus N-All. CONCLUSION: A complementary strategy with maternal RSVpreF vaccination and nirsevimab immunization for otherwise unprotected and preterm infants in Germany would provide a greater benefit compared to nirsevimab alone, protecting substantially more infants at lower total costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-026-01344-1
Primary Topic
Respiratory viral infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Immunization Strategies to Protect Infants Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Germany: A Decision Modeling Study

Julia Schiffner-Rohe, Mark Atwood, Ahuva Averin, Bennet Huebbe et al.
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Respiratory viral infections research
article

Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Immunization Strategies to Protect Infants Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Germany: A Decision Modeling Study

Julia Schiffner-Rohe, Mark Atwood, Ahuva Averin, Bennet Huebbe, Christof von Eiff, Erin Quinn, Caroline Lade, Lea J. Bayer, Amy W. Law
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Germany's Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) recommends the use of monoclonal antibody nirsevimab for infants in their first respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) season; however, incorporating RSVpreF maternal vaccination may protect more infants while lowering healthcare costs. We therefore evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a complementary immunization approach comprising maternal RSVpreF vaccination during pregnancy and nirsevimab for infants not yet protected to prevent lower respiratory tract disease due to RSV (RSV-LRTD) among infants in Germany. METHODS: Clinical and economic outcomes of RSV-LRTD and the expected impact of interventions were modeled from birth to age < 1 year. Model inputs were based on German data as available. Intervention strategies included no intervention, nirsevimab alone (N-all; uptake 70%), and the complementary immunization approach (MV + N). MV + N comprised seasonally administered maternal vaccination (MV; uptake 50%) with nirsevimab (N; uptake 70%) for unprotected infants (MV + N). Nirsevimab was administered seasonally with catch-up for infants born outside the RSV season. Analyses were conducted from the societal perspective and discounted 3% annually. RESULTS: Without immunization, 70,041 cases of RSV-LRTD (hospital: 23,273, ambulatory: 46,768) and 22 deaths were projected; total RSV-attributable medical care costs were 118.6 million (M) €. With N-all, there were 39,247 cases (hospital 12,953; ambulatory 26,294) and 13 deaths; total associated costs were 311.5M € (intervention 237.2M €; medical care 66.0M €; indirect 8.4M €). Compared to N-all, MV + N prevented an additional 666 cases and 1 death, with a difference in total costs of - 17.8M € (intervention - 12.7M €; medical care - 4.7M €; indirect - 0.4M €). With 31 QALYs gained, MV + N was dominant versus N-All. CONCLUSION: A complementary strategy with maternal RSVpreF vaccination and nirsevimab immunization for otherwise unprotected and preterm infants in Germany would provide a greater benefit compared to nirsevimab alone, protecting substantially more infants at lower total costs.

Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Pfizer (United States) (US), Pfizer (Germany) (DE), Prevea Health (US), IGES Institut (DE)
Pfizer
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Respiratory viral infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.