Understanding Spine Biologics: A Systematic Review of Demineralized Bone Matrix in Spinal Fusion From 2014-2024

Study DesignSystematic Review.ObjectivesDemineralized bone matrix (DBM) is an allograft material commonly used as an adjunct in spinal fusion. This review summarizes literature from the past decade describing DBM use in spinal fusion and provides an updated analysis of fusion outcomes based on product type and characteristics.MethodsA systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE and CENTRAL. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Back and Neck criteria for randomized studies and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria for nonrandomized studies. Extracted data included study design, sample size, procedure type, DBM product, fusion outcomes, complications, and follow-up duration. Additional product characteristics, such as DBM form (fiber-based or particulate-based) and sterility method (aseptic or terminal irradiation), were identified from tissue bank data.ResultsTwenty-one studies met inclusion criteria: 3 randomized (level I evidence), 4 level II, ten level III, and 4 level IV. Seven studies examined cervical procedures, and 14 addressed lumbar procedures. Posterior lumbar fusion (n = 6) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (n = 6) were most common. Among 18 comparative studies, 17 found no significant difference in fusion outcomes between DBM and comparison groups.ConclusionsDBM used as an autograft extender demonstrated fusion rates comparable to alternative graft materials. However, the predominance of nonrandomized, retrospective designs and limited controlled data result in low overall evidence quality. Further high-quality prospective studies are warranted to better define the role of DBM in spinal fusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261419756
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Spine Biologics: A Systematic Review of Demineralized Bone Matrix in Spinal Fusion From 2014-2024

Muhsin Quraishi, Fernando Ĺ. Vale, Alexander F. Post, Molly Butler et al.
Global Spine Journal
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Understanding Spine Biologics: A Systematic Review of Demineralized Bone Matrix in Spinal Fusion From 2014-2024

Muhsin Quraishi, Fernando Ĺ. Vale, Alexander F. Post, Molly Butler, Christopher Carr, Blake Martin
article en

Abstract

Study DesignSystematic Review.ObjectivesDemineralized bone matrix (DBM) is an allograft material commonly used as an adjunct in spinal fusion. This review summarizes literature from the past decade describing DBM use in spinal fusion and provides an updated analysis of fusion outcomes based on product type and characteristics.MethodsA systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE and CENTRAL. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Back and Neck criteria for randomized studies and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria for nonrandomized studies. Extracted data included study design, sample size, procedure type, DBM product, fusion outcomes, complications, and follow-up duration. Additional product characteristics, such as DBM form (fiber-based or particulate-based) and sterility method (aseptic or terminal irradiation), were identified from tissue bank data.ResultsTwenty-one studies met inclusion criteria: 3 randomized (level I evidence), 4 level II, ten level III, and 4 level IV. Seven studies examined cervical procedures, and 14 addressed lumbar procedures. Posterior lumbar fusion (n = 6) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (n = 6) were most common. Among 18 comparative studies, 17 found no significant difference in fusion outcomes between DBM and comparison groups.ConclusionsDBM used as an autograft extender demonstrated fusion rates comparable to alternative graft materials. However, the predominance of nonrandomized, retrospective designs and limited controlled data result in low overall evidence quality. Further high-quality prospective studies are warranted to better define the role of DBM in spinal fusion.

Global Spine Journal
Augusta University (US), Maine Farmland Trust (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding Spine Biologics: A Systematic Review of Demineralized Bone Matrix in Spinal Fusion From 2014-2024 — Muhsin Quraishi, Fernando Ĺ. Vale, et al. · Global Spine Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS