People-First Court Data

Court-focused research is increasingly data driven, yet most available court data are organized around cases and institutions rather than the people who move through the legal system. As a result, existing quantitative measures provide a detailed picture of court activity from the courts’ perspective but reveal little about litigants’ cumulative experiences across cases and time. This article advances a people-first approach to court data that reorients the unit of analysis from cases to individuals, enabling new forms of empirical, legal, and policy analysis. The article surveys the current court data landscape, reviews methodological strategies for generating people-first measures from existing data sources, and examines how researchers and courts can address challenges related to privacy, deidentification, and data security. It argues that people-first court data can enhance transparency, support better-informed legal and policy decisions, and deepen understanding of how courts function for those who use them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-042224-090838
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

People-First Court Data

Lauren Sudeall, Charlotte S. Alexander
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

People-First Court Data

Lauren Sudeall, Charlotte S. Alexander
article en

Abstract

Court-focused research is increasingly data driven, yet most available court data are organized around cases and institutions rather than the people who move through the legal system. As a result, existing quantitative measures provide a detailed picture of court activity from the courts’ perspective but reveal little about litigants’ cumulative experiences across cases and time. This article advances a people-first approach to court data that reorients the unit of analysis from cases to individuals, enabling new forms of empirical, legal, and policy analysis. The article surveys the current court data landscape, reviews methodological strategies for generating people-first measures from existing data sources, and examines how researchers and courts can address challenges related to privacy, deidentification, and data security. It argues that people-first court data can enhance transparency, support better-informed legal and policy decisions, and deepen understanding of how courts function for those who use them.

Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Vanderbilt University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.