Automating Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Programming with Evoked Resonant Neural Activity in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND: Optimal outcomes from subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) depend on accurate stimulation of an ideal functional target within the dorsolateral STN. Clinical programming is heuristic, and objective methods are needed to improve efficiency and consistency. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and acute motor benefit of STN-DBS programming, guided by intraoperatively recorded evoked resonant neural activity (ERNA) in patients with PD. METHODS: We assessed 12 patients with anatomically well-placed leads, 4-6 months following STN-DBS. The worst hemibody was tested off-medication. Acute motor benefit was double-blind assessed for three programming configurations: (i) chronic expert clinician settings, (ii) imaging guided, and (iii) an ERNA automated algorithm. We also compared therapeutic and side effect thresholds and the spatial distribution of fractionated current. RESULTS: ERNA programming improved hemibody Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Part III scores by 75.7% (median) compared with off-stimulation. This was not different from imaging (81.6%, P = 0.19) or clinician programming (68.8%, P = 0.33). Therapeutic thresholds (P = 0.90) and side effect thresholds (P = 0.57) did not differ across conditions. ERNA programming was 0.8-1 mm ventral and 0.3 mm posterior to imaging and clinician programming. CONCLUSIONS: A programming algorithm based solely on ERNA achieved acute motor efficacy and tolerability equivalent to expert clinical and imaging-based approaches. ERNA recordings took <1 min, under awake and general anesthetic conditions. These findings suggest that intraoperative ERNA can provide a rapid, objective, and practical starting point for STN-DBS programming. © 2026 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Movement Disorders
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.70318
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automating Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Programming with Evoked Resonant Neural Activity in Parkinson's Disease

Wesley Thevathasan, San San Xu, Kanae Jennifer Nagao, Hugh McDermott et al.
Movement Disorders
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Automating Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Programming with Evoked Resonant Neural Activity in Parkinson's Disease

Wesley Thevathasan, San San Xu, Kanae Jennifer Nagao, Hugh McDermott, Matthew A. Petoe, Ashton Moorhead, Thushara Perera, Kristian Bulluss, Wee‐Lih Lee, Kiaran Lawson
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal outcomes from subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) depend on accurate stimulation of an ideal functional target within the dorsolateral STN. Clinical programming is heuristic, and objective methods are needed to improve efficiency and consistency. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and acute motor benefit of STN-DBS programming, guided by intraoperatively recorded evoked resonant neural activity (ERNA) in patients with PD. METHODS: We assessed 12 patients with anatomically well-placed leads, 4-6 months following STN-DBS. The worst hemibody was tested off-medication. Acute motor benefit was double-blind assessed for three programming configurations: (i) chronic expert clinician settings, (ii) imaging guided, and (iii) an ERNA automated algorithm. We also compared therapeutic and side effect thresholds and the spatial distribution of fractionated current. RESULTS: ERNA programming improved hemibody Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Part III scores by 75.7% (median) compared with off-stimulation. This was not different from imaging (81.6%, P = 0.19) or clinician programming (68.8%, P = 0.33). Therapeutic thresholds (P = 0.90) and side effect thresholds (P = 0.57) did not differ across conditions. ERNA programming was 0.8-1 mm ventral and 0.3 mm posterior to imaging and clinician programming. CONCLUSIONS: A programming algorithm based solely on ERNA achieved acute motor efficacy and tolerability equivalent to expert clinical and imaging-based approaches. ERNA recordings took <1 min, under awake and general anesthetic conditions. These findings suggest that intraoperative ERNA can provide a rapid, objective, and practical starting point for STN-DBS programming. © 2026 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Movement Disorders
Bionics Institute (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU), Cabrini Hospital (AU), XING Technologies (Australia) (AU), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB), Austin Health (AU), University College London (GB)
University of Melbourne
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.