Explore factors affecting students’ acceptance of AI resurrection and ethical dilemmas in AI resurrection technology among Chinese college students: a cross-sectional study

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have brought AI resurrection, the digital reconstruction of the deceased closer to reality. Understanding the psychological factors associated with acceptance of this technology is essential for informing its ethical and educational implications. This cross–sectional study investigated Chinese college students’ acceptance of AI resurrection and examined demographic, death-related background factors, and AI-related predictors. A total of 990 valid responses were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.799). Spearman’s correlation and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between variables and acceptance levels across five hypothetical scenarios. Higher AI engagement and stronger perceived harm predictability were positively associated with acceptance of AI resurrection technologies, whereas fear of AI demonstrated scenario–dependent effects. Participants who had experienced the death of loved ones or studied medicine showed greater acceptance. Nearly half of the respondents (47.9%) believed that both the deceased’s and family’s wishes should be considered in resurrection decisions. Cognitive and affective factors were associated with individuals’ acceptance of AI resurrection technologies. These findings contribute to understanding human-AI interaction in existential contexts and emphasize the importance of consent and data protection in future applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04496-4
Primary Topic
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explore factors affecting students’ acceptance of AI resurrection and ethical dilemmas in AI resurrection technology among Chinese college students: a cross-sectional study

M T Sun, Nini Cheng
BMC Psychology
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
article

Explore factors affecting students’ acceptance of AI resurrection and ethical dilemmas in AI resurrection technology among Chinese college students: a cross-sectional study

M T Sun, Nini Cheng
article en

Abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have brought AI resurrection, the digital reconstruction of the deceased closer to reality. Understanding the psychological factors associated with acceptance of this technology is essential for informing its ethical and educational implications. This cross–sectional study investigated Chinese college students’ acceptance of AI resurrection and examined demographic, death-related background factors, and AI-related predictors. A total of 990 valid responses were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.799). Spearman’s correlation and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between variables and acceptance levels across five hypothetical scenarios. Higher AI engagement and stronger perceived harm predictability were positively associated with acceptance of AI resurrection technologies, whereas fear of AI demonstrated scenario–dependent effects. Participants who had experienced the death of loved ones or studied medicine showed greater acceptance. Nearly half of the respondents (47.9%) believed that both the deceased’s and family’s wishes should be considered in resurrection decisions. Cognitive and affective factors were associated with individuals’ acceptance of AI resurrection technologies. These findings contribute to understanding human-AI interaction in existential contexts and emphasize the importance of consent and data protection in future applications.

BMC Psychology
Central South University (CN)
Central South University
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.