Type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI in atrial fibrillation: insights from the HERA-FIB registry

BACKGROUND: Differentiating type 1 from type 2 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is clinically challenging, particularly in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), where the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI) allows classification based on presumed mechanisms without mandatory coronary angiography. Real-world data from AF cohorts undergoing systematic invasive evaluation remain limited. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2020, we analyzed consecutive AF patients admitted with NSTEMI to a tertiary care center. Patients undergoing early coronary angiography were included. Infarct subtypes were adjudicated according to the 4th UDMI incorporating angiographic findings. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI. The secondary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding. RESULTS: Among 536 eligible patients, 438 (81.7%) underwent coronary angiography. Of these, 312 (71.2%) were classified as type 1 NSTEMI, 100 (22.8%) as type 2 NSTEMI, and 26 (5.9%) as acute myocardial injury. Type 2 NSTEMI was associated with preserved left ventricular function and less extensive coronary artery disease. Over a median follow-up of 2.21 years, composite event rates were 40.1% in type 1 and 36.0% in type 2 NSTEMI. Acute myocardial injury was associated with the highest composite event rate (65.4%) and all-cause mortality (57.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic AF patients, type 1 NSTEMI predominates and may be underdiagnosed without angiography, which enables accurate classification and timely revascularization. Type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI confer similarly high long-term risk, while acute myocardial injury identifies a particularly high-risk subgroup requiring systematic evaluation and targeted management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Heidelberg Registry of Atrial Fibrillation [HERA‑FIB]; NCT05995561.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-026-02912-8
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI in atrial fibrillation: insights from the HERA-FIB registry

Norbert Frey, Christian Salbach, Evangelos Giannitsis, Matthias Mueller‐Hennessen et al.
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI in atrial fibrillation: insights from the HERA-FIB registry

Norbert Frey, Christian Salbach, Evangelos Giannitsis, Matthias Mueller‐Hennessen, J. Dürr, Mustafa Yıldırım, Hugo A. Katus
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differentiating type 1 from type 2 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is clinically challenging, particularly in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), where the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI) allows classification based on presumed mechanisms without mandatory coronary angiography. Real-world data from AF cohorts undergoing systematic invasive evaluation remain limited. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2020, we analyzed consecutive AF patients admitted with NSTEMI to a tertiary care center. Patients undergoing early coronary angiography were included. Infarct subtypes were adjudicated according to the 4th UDMI incorporating angiographic findings. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI. The secondary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding. RESULTS: Among 536 eligible patients, 438 (81.7%) underwent coronary angiography. Of these, 312 (71.2%) were classified as type 1 NSTEMI, 100 (22.8%) as type 2 NSTEMI, and 26 (5.9%) as acute myocardial injury. Type 2 NSTEMI was associated with preserved left ventricular function and less extensive coronary artery disease. Over a median follow-up of 2.21 years, composite event rates were 40.1% in type 1 and 36.0% in type 2 NSTEMI. Acute myocardial injury was associated with the highest composite event rate (65.4%) and all-cause mortality (57.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic AF patients, type 1 NSTEMI predominates and may be underdiagnosed without angiography, which enables accurate classification and timely revascularization. Type 1 and type 2 NSTEMI confer similarly high long-term risk, while acute myocardial injury identifies a particularly high-risk subgroup requiring systematic evaluation and targeted management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Heidelberg Registry of Atrial Fibrillation [HERA‑FIB]; NCT05995561.

Clinical Research in Cardiology
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Bayer Vital, Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.