Evaluation of Surface Treatment on the Fracture Performance of <scp>CFRP</scp> / <scp>TC4</scp> Adhesively Bonded Joints: Effect of Physical Methods

ABSTRACT With the application of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP)/metal adhesively bonded structures, selecting appropriate metal surface treatments is crucial for structural reliability. This study investigates the effect of physical surface treatment (sand‐blasting, unidirectional brushed finish, laser treatment, and polishing) of TC4 adherend on the fracture performance of CFRP/TC4 adhesively bonded joints. The results indicate that the surface wettability of the TC4 adherend is closely associated with the dominant failure mode and consequently the fracture toughness. Strong linear correlations exist between surface free energy (SFE) and fracture toughness, which can be interpreted within the framework of the thermodynamic work of adhesion: higher surface energy correlates with stronger interfacial bonding, a factor that may promote cohesive failure and engage the adhesive's energy‐dissipation mechanisms. As a result, the sand‐blasted TC4 surface exhibits the highest wettability (contact angle of 31.87° and SFE of 63.44 mN/m), showing cohesive failure and the highest fracture toughness (Mode I and Mode II fracture toughness of 480.84 and 2970.19 J/m 2 ). While the brushed TC4 surface exhibits the poorest wettability (contact angle of 84.12° and SFE of 28.9 mN/m), showing adhesive failure and the lowest toughness (Mode I and Mode II fracture toughness of 182.16 and 476.57 J/m 2 ). The laser‐treated and polished surfaces exhibit intermediate fracture performance, consistent with their respective surface free energies. Therefore, sand‐blasting is recommended as the preferred physical surface treatment method for TC4 adherend.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Composites
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.71111
Primary Topic
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Surface Treatment on the Fracture Performance of CFRP / TC4 Adhesively Bonded Joints: Effect of Physical Methods

Huiming Ding, W Wang, Yi-Xiang Wang, Shiyang Zhu et al.
Polymer Composites
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
article

Evaluation of Surface Treatment on the Fracture Performance of CFRP / TC4 Adhesively Bonded Joints: Effect of Physical Methods

Huiming Ding, W Wang, Yi-Xiang Wang, Shiyang Zhu, Peng Ruan, Shuang Song
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the application of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP)/metal adhesively bonded structures, selecting appropriate metal surface treatments is crucial for structural reliability. This study investigates the effect of physical surface treatment (sand‐blasting, unidirectional brushed finish, laser treatment, and polishing) of TC4 adherend on the fracture performance of CFRP/TC4 adhesively bonded joints. The results indicate that the surface wettability of the TC4 adherend is closely associated with the dominant failure mode and consequently the fracture toughness. Strong linear correlations exist between surface free energy (SFE) and fracture toughness, which can be interpreted within the framework of the thermodynamic work of adhesion: higher surface energy correlates with stronger interfacial bonding, a factor that may promote cohesive failure and engage the adhesive's energy‐dissipation mechanisms. As a result, the sand‐blasted TC4 surface exhibits the highest wettability (contact angle of 31.87° and SFE of 63.44 mN/m), showing cohesive failure and the highest fracture toughness (Mode I and Mode II fracture toughness of 480.84 and 2970.19 J/m 2 ). While the brushed TC4 surface exhibits the poorest wettability (contact angle of 84.12° and SFE of 28.9 mN/m), showing adhesive failure and the lowest toughness (Mode I and Mode II fracture toughness of 182.16 and 476.57 J/m 2 ). The laser‐treated and polished surfaces exhibit intermediate fracture performance, consistent with their respective surface free energies. Therefore, sand‐blasting is recommended as the preferred physical surface treatment method for TC4 adherend.

Polymer Composites
Electric Propulsion Laboratory (United States) (US), Zhejiang Institute of Special Equipment Inspection (CN), Zhejiang Lab (CN), Wuhan Ship Development & Design Institute (CN), Hangzhou Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute (CN)
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.