Healthcare professionals’ perspectives and/or experiences of digital mental health tools in clinical practice: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
Background: Mental health difficulties are highly prevalent worldwide. Digital mental health tools (DMHTs) have been developed to increase accessibility to mental healthcare for people who may struggle to access care due to cost, location or stigma. As the views of stakeholders are important in understanding the potential barriers to and facilitators of DMHT implementation, the aims of this review were to critically appraise and synthesise qualitative findings relating to the perceptions and/or experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) on the use of digital mental health tools in clinical practice. Method: A systematic search of mixed-method and qualitative studies was performed using five databases. Eligible studies were quality-assessed. Data were analysed using inductive thematic synthesis. Results: and Conclusion: HCPs strongly endorsed the view that DMHTs offer increased access to care, however, concerns about their therapeutic quality, risk management, and workload burden persist. Context-sensitive implementation and proper infrastructure are essential for successful integration into mental health services. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020188879.
Authors
- Emily Eisner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5164-2407)
- Claudia Martin
- Anja Wittkowski
Institutions
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- Mental Health Foundation (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Published
- 2026-04-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1743614
- Primary Topic
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00