Decoding Psychological Abuse: A Comparative Study of Natural Language Processing (NLP) Classifiers Using Reddit Data

Psychological abuse, a form of intimate partner violence (IPV), involves non-physical behaviors meant to control, humiliate, punish, or threaten a partner. Despite its strong link to other forms of abuse, scholarly disagreement makes its definition ambiguous. Data-driven approaches, particularly machine learning (ML), remain underutilized in IPV research but offer advantages such as uncovering hidden patterns, efficiency, and scalability. This work applies natural language processing (NLP) modeling techniques (traditional modeling, fine-tuning, and few-shot learning) to classify six types of psychological abuse on a dataset of 1,500 labeled Reddit posts. Our LLaMA-3.70 few-shot model establishes a state-of-the-art baseline for this dataset. Not only does our study reveal that it is possible to employ NLP modeling to detect psychological abuse, it also demonstrates how some computational methods can make use of very limited datasets to produce high-quality results within the social sciences. We also apply an explainability measure (LIME) to surface model biases. This technique deepens understanding of model behavior, contextualizes performance, and sets a precedent for using computational methods in nuanced, human-centered social science research. This study demonstrates how ML paired with explainability measures can advance rigorous, responsible research in social disciplines involving ethical or semantic uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Computer Review
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393261435087
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding Psychological Abuse: A Comparative Study of Natural Language Processing (NLP) Classifiers Using Reddit Data

Leonie Maria Tanczer, Enrico Mariconti, María Pérez‐Ortiz, Maya Ashkenazi et al.
Social Science Computer Review
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Decoding Psychological Abuse: A Comparative Study of Natural Language Processing (NLP) Classifiers Using Reddit Data

Leonie Maria Tanczer, Enrico Mariconti, María Pérez‐Ortiz, Maya Ashkenazi, Jessica Lilly Neubauer
article en

Abstract

Psychological abuse, a form of intimate partner violence (IPV), involves non-physical behaviors meant to control, humiliate, punish, or threaten a partner. Despite its strong link to other forms of abuse, scholarly disagreement makes its definition ambiguous. Data-driven approaches, particularly machine learning (ML), remain underutilized in IPV research but offer advantages such as uncovering hidden patterns, efficiency, and scalability. This work applies natural language processing (NLP) modeling techniques (traditional modeling, fine-tuning, and few-shot learning) to classify six types of psychological abuse on a dataset of 1,500 labeled Reddit posts. Our LLaMA-3.70 few-shot model establishes a state-of-the-art baseline for this dataset. Not only does our study reveal that it is possible to employ NLP modeling to detect psychological abuse, it also demonstrates how some computational methods can make use of very limited datasets to produce high-quality results within the social sciences. We also apply an explainability measure (LIME) to surface model biases. This technique deepens understanding of model behavior, contextualizes performance, and sets a precedent for using computational methods in nuanced, human-centered social science research. This study demonstrates how ML paired with explainability measures can advance rigorous, responsible research in social disciplines involving ethical or semantic uncertainty.

Social Science Computer Review
University College London (GB)
UK Prevention Research Partnership
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.