Coherence Evaluation, Feelings, and Emotions: The Felt Layer of Regulation

This concept paper argues that feelings and emotions belong to a phenomenally available layer through which a cognitive system registers the significance of its current and projected state for viable continuation. Building on a broader framework of coherence evaluation, the paper proposes that what becomes felt depends not only on the present state, but also on trajectory, available continuation, and accumulated uncompensated load. It further argues that coherence-related evaluation is primary in a pre-symbolic sense, while symbolic description is a later reconstruction, and that inner manifestation is broader than what becomes expressed or enacted. A central claim of the paper is that positive manifestation belongs not to a special positive state, but only to movement toward stabilization. The article offers a minimal conceptual account of why a cognitive system needs a felt layer and how feelings and emotions can be understood as different scales of that regulatory function.The present article does not argue that phenomenality is something over and above regulation. It argues that, in systems of the relevant kind, certain regulatory distinctions must become inwardly available in a way that is not merely hidden, symbolic, or externally describable. It is this inwardly distinguishable availability that is here treated as the minimal sense of the felt layer.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19588490
Primary Topic
Emotions and Moral Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coherence Evaluation, Feelings, and Emotions: The Felt Layer of Regulation

Kostiantyn Osmolovskyi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Emotions and Moral Behavior
article

Coherence Evaluation, Feelings, and Emotions: The Felt Layer of Regulation

Kostiantyn Osmolovskyi
article en

Abstract

This concept paper argues that feelings and emotions belong to a phenomenally available layer through which a cognitive system registers the significance of its current and projected state for viable continuation. Building on a broader framework of coherence evaluation, the paper proposes that what becomes felt depends not only on the present state, but also on trajectory, available continuation, and accumulated uncompensated load. It further argues that coherence-related evaluation is primary in a pre-symbolic sense, while symbolic description is a later reconstruction, and that inner manifestation is broader than what becomes expressed or enacted. A central claim of the paper is that positive manifestation belongs not to a special positive state, but only to movement toward stabilization. The article offers a minimal conceptual account of why a cognitive system needs a felt layer and how feelings and emotions can be understood as different scales of that regulatory function.The present article does not argue that phenomenality is something over and above regulation. It argues that, in systems of the relevant kind, certain regulatory distinctions must become inwardly available in a way that is not merely hidden, symbolic, or externally describable. It is this inwardly distinguishable availability that is here treated as the minimal sense of the felt layer.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Emotions and Moral Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.