Infectious Agents of Non‐Malarial Febrile Illnesses in 20 African Countries, 2019–2024: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

BACKGROUND: The growing attention to non-malarial febrile illnesses (NMFIs), driven by the decline in malaria cases across the African continent, has revealed pathogens previously overshadowed by the burden of malaria. Recent outbreaks, the resurgence of diseases and the rising antimicrobial resistance burden, compounded with data gaps in previous studies, have underscored the need to closely examine this area in recent times. METHODS: We searched for articles through PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science databases to identify the common causative agents of NMFIs and estimate their proportional morbidity rates (PMRs) in Africa, stratifying agents across setting (rural vs. urban), population status (inpatient vs. outpatient) and outbreak status. We included studies that enrolled patients presenting with acute undifferentiated fever defined as fever without an identified alternative cause. RESULTS: We analysed 101 studies comprising 68,905 febrile patients across 20 African countries, most with high risk of bias. Viruses were most frequently reported, with dengue and chikungunya viruses showing high PMR estimates of 6.8% (95% CI: 2.7%-16.2%) and 24.1% (95% CI: 7.0%-57.1%) respectively. Bacteria were less common (pooled PMR: < 5% each) but predominated among inpatients (80.4%), with K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, E. coli and S. pneumoniae most frequently reported and often resistant to penicillins, fluoroquinolones and 3rd-generation cephalosporins. Among outpatients, viral infections dominated (82.9%), particularly dengue and chikungunya in urban and outbreak contexts. In rural areas, S. pneumoniae, C. burnetii and Borrelia spp. were common bacterial causes, while dengue, Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever and Rift Valley fever viruses predominated. Despite the predominance of molecular methods, most studies included the use of both molecular and serological methods. CONCLUSION: The causative agents of NMFIs in Africa are enormous and context-specific. These findings highlight the need to move beyond malaria-centric fever management toward context-specific diagnostic and surveillance strategies. Methodological harmonisation is necessary to yield reliable summary estimates in future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.70097
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infectious Agents of Non‐Malarial Febrile Illnesses in 20 African Countries, 2019–2024: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Isaac Anim‐Baidoo, Alex Odoom, Wilfred Ofosu, Eric S. Donkor
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Malaria Research and Control
article

Infectious Agents of Non‐Malarial Febrile Illnesses in 20 African Countries, 2019–2024: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Isaac Anim‐Baidoo, Alex Odoom, Wilfred Ofosu, Eric S. Donkor
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The growing attention to non-malarial febrile illnesses (NMFIs), driven by the decline in malaria cases across the African continent, has revealed pathogens previously overshadowed by the burden of malaria. Recent outbreaks, the resurgence of diseases and the rising antimicrobial resistance burden, compounded with data gaps in previous studies, have underscored the need to closely examine this area in recent times. METHODS: We searched for articles through PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science databases to identify the common causative agents of NMFIs and estimate their proportional morbidity rates (PMRs) in Africa, stratifying agents across setting (rural vs. urban), population status (inpatient vs. outpatient) and outbreak status. We included studies that enrolled patients presenting with acute undifferentiated fever defined as fever without an identified alternative cause. RESULTS: We analysed 101 studies comprising 68,905 febrile patients across 20 African countries, most with high risk of bias. Viruses were most frequently reported, with dengue and chikungunya viruses showing high PMR estimates of 6.8% (95% CI: 2.7%-16.2%) and 24.1% (95% CI: 7.0%-57.1%) respectively. Bacteria were less common (pooled PMR: < 5% each) but predominated among inpatients (80.4%), with K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, E. coli and S. pneumoniae most frequently reported and often resistant to penicillins, fluoroquinolones and 3rd-generation cephalosporins. Among outpatients, viral infections dominated (82.9%), particularly dengue and chikungunya in urban and outbreak contexts. In rural areas, S. pneumoniae, C. burnetii and Borrelia spp. were common bacterial causes, while dengue, Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever and Rift Valley fever viruses predominated. Despite the predominance of molecular methods, most studies included the use of both molecular and serological methods. CONCLUSION: The causative agents of NMFIs in Africa are enormous and context-specific. These findings highlight the need to move beyond malaria-centric fever management toward context-specific diagnostic and surveillance strategies. Methodological harmonisation is necessary to yield reliable summary estimates in future studies.

Tropical Medicine & International Health
University of Ghana (GH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.