Evaluation of Extended Indications for Cochlear Implantation Beyond Conventional Criteria

Objective: This study evaluated the indications for cochlear implant (CI) that extend beyond the current criteria of the Health Implementation Communiqué (HIC) of the Turkish Social Security Institution. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 27 patients who underwent CI, even though they did not meet the HIC criteria. All cases were approved by the Scientific Advisory Board on Auditory Implants of the Ministry of Health. Demographic, clinical, and audiological data, including pre- and post-operative pure-tone averages (PTA) and speech discrimination scores (SDS), were analyzed. Results: The cohort included 15 females and 12 males, with a median age of 17 years. Etiologies comprised congenital hearing loss (n=14), idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (n=3), post-meningitic hearing loss (n=2), Menière's disease (n=1), and other acquired causes. Exclusion from the HIC criteria was mainly due to age restrictions for bilateral CI, audiological thresholds outside defined limits, single-sided deafness, SDS above 30%, or a gap of more than four years between chronological and language age. Audiological outcomes from 22 patients revealed a median PTA with the CI alone of 35 dB hearing level and a median SDS of 58%, with significant improvement compared to baseline (p<0.001). While most patients demonstrated substantial benefit, 14.8% (cases 6, 17, 21, 25) exhibited poor performance (SDS <30%). Case analyses underscored the impact of etiology and duration of auditory deprivation on outcomes. Conclusion: CI beyond conventional reimbursement criteria can provide meaningful functional gains. Individualized, evidence-based, multidisciplinary evaluation supports broader access to hearing rehabilitation and is consistent with global trends in personalized auditory care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/tao.2026.2025-11-17
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Extended Indications for Cochlear Implantation Beyond Conventional Criteria

Serap Er, Sibel Alicura Tokgöz, Mehmet Murat Günay, İlker Akyıldız et al.
Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Evaluation of Extended Indications for Cochlear Implantation Beyond Conventional Criteria

Serap Er, Sibel Alicura Tokgöz, Mehmet Murat Günay, İlker Akyıldız, Murad Mutlu, Dilara Söylemez, Muharrem Dağlı
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the indications for cochlear implant (CI) that extend beyond the current criteria of the Health Implementation Communiqué (HIC) of the Turkish Social Security Institution. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 27 patients who underwent CI, even though they did not meet the HIC criteria. All cases were approved by the Scientific Advisory Board on Auditory Implants of the Ministry of Health. Demographic, clinical, and audiological data, including pre- and post-operative pure-tone averages (PTA) and speech discrimination scores (SDS), were analyzed. Results: The cohort included 15 females and 12 males, with a median age of 17 years. Etiologies comprised congenital hearing loss (n=14), idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (n=3), post-meningitic hearing loss (n=2), Menière's disease (n=1), and other acquired causes. Exclusion from the HIC criteria was mainly due to age restrictions for bilateral CI, audiological thresholds outside defined limits, single-sided deafness, SDS above 30%, or a gap of more than four years between chronological and language age. Audiological outcomes from 22 patients revealed a median PTA with the CI alone of 35 dB hearing level and a median SDS of 58%, with significant improvement compared to baseline (p<0.001). While most patients demonstrated substantial benefit, 14.8% (cases 6, 17, 21, 25) exhibited poor performance (SDS <30%). Case analyses underscored the impact of etiology and duration of auditory deprivation on outcomes. Conclusion: CI beyond conventional reimbursement criteria can provide meaningful functional gains. Individualized, evidence-based, multidisciplinary evaluation supports broader access to hearing rehabilitation and is consistent with global trends in personalized auditory care.

Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
University of Health Science (KH), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.