Impacts of dams on river herring populations through their native range: what’s left?

Introduction River herring (alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus , and blueback herring, Alosa aestivalis ) are native along the East Coast of North America. These fish are culturally important and provide critical ecosystem linkages between marine and freshwater habitats. Due to overfishing, and habitat loss (through degradation and damming), river herring populations are at historical lows across their native range. In the last 200 years, dams and other impoundments have reduced access to spawning habitat for these and other anadromous fish. Methods To assess the theoretical coast-wide spawning potential for river herring, we quantified historically accessible spawning habitat (pre-dam) in coastal freshwater rivers using physical river characteristics (width and gradient). To assess the impact of dams on spawning habitat, we used a dams database to segment river reaches. This allowed us to characterize spawning habitat upstream and downstream of dams. River-specific population models were then used to estimate the number of potential spawners for each species, based on habitat estimates and life history parameters. We investigated three scenarios: no dams, favorable dam passage, and no dam passage. We use these simulations to compare the theoretical spawning potential for river herring prior to and after dam construction coastwide. Results We estimated that 52% of alewife and 51% of blueback herring habitat is located upstream of dams throughout the East Coast of North America. This results in a theoretical loss of ~880 million alewife and ~100 million blueback herring potential spawners due to dams, reducing both the ecological connection and fishery potential of these species. Discussion Even with the best-case “current” scenario for fish passage, we observed marginal increases in spawner abundance. These results highlight the relatively small theoretical influence current passage structures may have on restoring river herring to their historical abundances compared to dam removal. Our sensitivity analyses demonstrate that upstream passage to access additional habitat is only advantageous when effective juvenile and adult downstream passage are in place.