Effects of Electoral System Change on the Partisan Bias of Electoral Reformers

ABSTRACT This paper analyzes how electoral system change affects the electoral performance of those parties that initiate these reforms. The hypothesis is that those who created the new system benefited from it in two possible ways: they improved their partisan bias compared to the previous election, or they had a better partisan bias than other parties. The analysis uses a global dataset that includes almost all democratic elections that took place between 1974 and 2017. The paper finds that electoral reformers had no discernible advantage compared to other parties, suggesting that either partisan electoral engineering is not as widely practiced as previously believed, or parties are not efficient at executing it. Related Articles Nohlen, D. 2008. “Constitutional Jurisdiction and the Consolidation of Democracy.” Politics & Policy 37, no. 1: 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2008.00159.x . Raymond, C. 2018. “Socioeconomic Development and Party System Fragmentation Cross‐Nationally.” Politics & Policy 46, no. 5: 731–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12272 . Zafirovski, M. 2022. “Toward a New Political Democracy Index: Construction, Validation, and Calculation for Individual Societies and Types of Society.” Politics & Policy 50, no. 4: 663–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12488 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics &amp Policy
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.70134
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Electoral System Change on the Partisan Bias of Electoral Reformers

Gergely Rajnai
Politics &amp Policy
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Effects of Electoral System Change on the Partisan Bias of Electoral Reformers

Gergely Rajnai
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper analyzes how electoral system change affects the electoral performance of those parties that initiate these reforms. The hypothesis is that those who created the new system benefited from it in two possible ways: they improved their partisan bias compared to the previous election, or they had a better partisan bias than other parties. The analysis uses a global dataset that includes almost all democratic elections that took place between 1974 and 2017. The paper finds that electoral reformers had no discernible advantage compared to other parties, suggesting that either partisan electoral engineering is not as widely practiced as previously believed, or parties are not efficient at executing it. Related Articles Nohlen, D. 2008. “Constitutional Jurisdiction and the Consolidation of Democracy.” Politics & Policy 37, no. 1: 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2008.00159.x . Raymond, C. 2018. “Socioeconomic Development and Party System Fragmentation Cross‐Nationally.” Politics & Policy 46, no. 5: 731–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12272 . Zafirovski, M. 2022. “Toward a New Political Democracy Index: Construction, Validation, and Calculation for Individual Societies and Types of Society.” Politics & Policy 50, no. 4: 663–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12488 .

Politics &amp PolicyVol. 54(2)
Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.