Olopatadine plus mometasone for seasonal allergic rhinitis treatment: A pooled analysis of clinical trials

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to analyze the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of olopatadine HCl (antihistamine) and mometasone furoate (corticosteroid) (Olo/Mom, GSP301) for the treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR). METHODS: Efficacy data from one phase II (NCT02318303 [GSP301-201]) and two pivotal phase III double-blind, randomized, active, placebo-controlled (NCT02631551 [GSP301-301] and NCT02870205 [GSP301-304]) clinical trials were collated and analyzed. These studies investigated Olo/Mom (administered twice daily/BID) compared with placebo and its monotherapy constituents for the treatment of SAR in patients aged ≥12-years. In addition, safety data were analyzed from the aforementioned studies and a proof-of-concept study (NCT03444506 [GSP301-POC]). Primary and secondary endpoints were compared between Olo/Mom, its active mometasone and olopatadine constituents, and placebo. RESULTS: For the efficacy analyses (n = 2971), Olo/Mom significantly reduced rTNSS scores compared with placebo (Least Square Mean Difference [LSMD = -0.94]; 95% CI: -1.17, -0.70; p < 0.0001), olopatadine (LSMD = -0.37; 95% CI: -0.60, -0.14; p = 0.0019), and mometasone (LSMD = -0.42; 95% CI: -0.65, -0.18; p = 0.0005). Olo/Mom also significantly improved the RQLQ and iTNSS scores compared with placebo and its monotherapy constituents (p < 0.05, all). The onset of action of Olo/Mom was observed at 15-minutes and was sustained at subsequent timepoints. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in the Olo/Mom, placebo, olopatadine, and mometasone groups was 13.9%, 9.5%, 13.2%, and 7.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis demonstrated the superiority of Olo/Mom compared to its monotherapy constituents or placebo in reducing SAR symptoms over 14-days. Moreover, this study showed that Olo/Mom has a rapid onset of action and significantly improves RQLQ scores compared to placebo. Administration of Olo/Mom BID is an effective and well-tolerated option for the treatment of SAR in patients aged 12-years or older. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I (Level I - randomized controlled trials).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2026.101817
Primary Topic
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Olopatadine plus mometasone for seasonal allergic rhinitis treatment: A pooled analysis of clinical trials

Wen Wu, Vineet Aggarwal, Roger Hereward Gordonsmith, Márcio Nakanishi et al.
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
article

Olopatadine plus mometasone for seasonal allergic rhinitis treatment: A pooled analysis of clinical trials

Wen Wu, Vineet Aggarwal, Roger Hereward Gordonsmith, Márcio Nakanishi, Hanmant Barkate, Wilma Terezinha Anselmo-Lima, Luis Felipe Barreiras Carbone
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to analyze the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of olopatadine HCl (antihistamine) and mometasone furoate (corticosteroid) (Olo/Mom, GSP301) for the treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR). METHODS: Efficacy data from one phase II (NCT02318303 [GSP301-201]) and two pivotal phase III double-blind, randomized, active, placebo-controlled (NCT02631551 [GSP301-301] and NCT02870205 [GSP301-304]) clinical trials were collated and analyzed. These studies investigated Olo/Mom (administered twice daily/BID) compared with placebo and its monotherapy constituents for the treatment of SAR in patients aged ≥12-years. In addition, safety data were analyzed from the aforementioned studies and a proof-of-concept study (NCT03444506 [GSP301-POC]). Primary and secondary endpoints were compared between Olo/Mom, its active mometasone and olopatadine constituents, and placebo. RESULTS: For the efficacy analyses (n = 2971), Olo/Mom significantly reduced rTNSS scores compared with placebo (Least Square Mean Difference [LSMD = -0.94]; 95% CI: -1.17, -0.70; p < 0.0001), olopatadine (LSMD = -0.37; 95% CI: -0.60, -0.14; p = 0.0019), and mometasone (LSMD = -0.42; 95% CI: -0.65, -0.18; p = 0.0005). Olo/Mom also significantly improved the RQLQ and iTNSS scores compared with placebo and its monotherapy constituents (p < 0.05, all). The onset of action of Olo/Mom was observed at 15-minutes and was sustained at subsequent timepoints. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in the Olo/Mom, placebo, olopatadine, and mometasone groups was 13.9%, 9.5%, 13.2%, and 7.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis demonstrated the superiority of Olo/Mom compared to its monotherapy constituents or placebo in reducing SAR symptoms over 14-days. Moreover, this study showed that Olo/Mom has a rapid onset of action and significantly improves RQLQ scores compared to placebo. Administration of Olo/Mom BID is an effective and well-tolerated option for the treatment of SAR in patients aged 12-years or older. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I (Level I - randomized controlled trials).

Brazilian Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyVol. 92(4)
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Universidade de Brasília (BR), Glenmark Pharmaceuticals (India) (IN)
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.