Metabolic health phenotypes and cardiovascular disease among U.S. adults with central obesity: Evidence from NHANES 2011– March 2020

Background: Central obesity is strongly associated with cardiometabolic dysfunction and cardiovascular disease (CVD), yet CVD burden may vary by metabolic phenotype among affected adults. This study examined whether metabolically unhealthy central obesity (MUCO) is associated with higher CVD prevalence than metabolically healthy central obesity (MHCO), whether CVD increases in a dose-response manner with metabolic abnormality burden, and whether associations vary by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2011-March 2020, including adults ≥20 years with central obesity (≥102 cm (40″) in men; ≥88 cm (35″) in women). Metabolic phenotype was defined by four abnormalities: elevated blood pressure (≥130/85 mmHg or antihypertensive use), dysglycemia (HbA1c ≥ 5.7%, self-reported diabetes, or diabetes medication use), low HDL cholesterol (<40 mg/dL in men or <50 mg/dL in women), and hypercholesterolemia (physician diagnosis or lipid-lowering therapy). Participants were classified as MHCO (0-1 abnormality) or MUCO (≥2 abnormalities); abnormalities were summed (0-4) to assess dose-response. The outcome was self-reported physician-diagnosed CVD (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or angina). Survey-weighted Poisson regression estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 11,657 adults with central obesity, 6,997 were MHCO and 4,660 MUCO, representing 128.4 million U.S. adults. Weighted CVD prevalence was higher in MUCO than MHCO (15.7% vs 7.3%). After adjustment, MUCO was associated with higher CVD prevalence (PR 1.48; 95% CI 1.30-1.68; p < 0.001). Each additional metabolic abnormality increased CVD prevalence by 29% (PR 1.29; 95% CI 1.21-1.38; p < 0.001). The association was strongest among adults aged 20-39 years (PR 3.89; 95% CI 2.22-6.81), despite low absolute prevalence. Conclusions: Among U.S. adults with central obesity, metabolic dysfunction is associated with higher CVD prevalence, with a clear dose-response relationship. These findings support phenotype-based cardiovascular risk stratification beyond waist circumference and emphasize early identification and management of metabolic abnormalities, particularly in younger adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obesity Pillars
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obpill.2026.100267
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metabolic health phenotypes and cardiovascular disease among U.S. adults with central obesity: Evidence from NHANES 2011– March 2020

Emmanuel Amoako Agyei, Samuel Prince Osei, Dennis Dela Tsagli, Eunice Akomaning et al.
Obesity Pillars
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

Metabolic health phenotypes and cardiovascular disease among U.S. adults with central obesity: Evidence from NHANES 2011– March 2020

Emmanuel Amoako Agyei, Samuel Prince Osei, Dennis Dela Tsagli, Eunice Akomaning, David Kweku Aseda Donkor, Frederick Frimpong Opuni, Sandra Agyenim Boateng, Maxwell Emmie, Evelyn Gyau-Boakye, Adwoa Benyiwah Amoah
article en

Abstract

Background: Central obesity is strongly associated with cardiometabolic dysfunction and cardiovascular disease (CVD), yet CVD burden may vary by metabolic phenotype among affected adults. This study examined whether metabolically unhealthy central obesity (MUCO) is associated with higher CVD prevalence than metabolically healthy central obesity (MHCO), whether CVD increases in a dose-response manner with metabolic abnormality burden, and whether associations vary by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2011-March 2020, including adults ≥20 years with central obesity (≥102 cm (40″) in men; ≥88 cm (35″) in women). Metabolic phenotype was defined by four abnormalities: elevated blood pressure (≥130/85 mmHg or antihypertensive use), dysglycemia (HbA1c ≥ 5.7%, self-reported diabetes, or diabetes medication use), low HDL cholesterol (<40 mg/dL in men or <50 mg/dL in women), and hypercholesterolemia (physician diagnosis or lipid-lowering therapy). Participants were classified as MHCO (0-1 abnormality) or MUCO (≥2 abnormalities); abnormalities were summed (0-4) to assess dose-response. The outcome was self-reported physician-diagnosed CVD (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or angina). Survey-weighted Poisson regression estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 11,657 adults with central obesity, 6,997 were MHCO and 4,660 MUCO, representing 128.4 million U.S. adults. Weighted CVD prevalence was higher in MUCO than MHCO (15.7% vs 7.3%). After adjustment, MUCO was associated with higher CVD prevalence (PR 1.48; 95% CI 1.30-1.68; p < 0.001). Each additional metabolic abnormality increased CVD prevalence by 29% (PR 1.29; 95% CI 1.21-1.38; p < 0.001). The association was strongest among adults aged 20-39 years (PR 3.89; 95% CI 2.22-6.81), despite low absolute prevalence. Conclusions: Among U.S. adults with central obesity, metabolic dysfunction is associated with higher CVD prevalence, with a clear dose-response relationship. These findings support phenotype-based cardiovascular risk stratification beyond waist circumference and emphasize early identification and management of metabolic abnormalities, particularly in younger adults.

Obesity PillarsVol. 18
Washington University in St. Louis (US), Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (GH), Griffin Hospital (US), Dodowa Health Research Centre (GH), Ghana Education Service (GH), Naga Municipal Hospital (JP), Cape Fear Valley Medical Center (US), Kuma Hospital (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.