Understanding Farm Households’ Tolerance Toward Asian Elephants in China: Evidence from 873 Households in Yunnan Province
-tests, one-way ANOVA and ANCOVA were used to examine differences in tolerance among different groups of farm households. The results show that: (1) the overall tolerance toward Asian elephants among farm households is relatively low (mean = 2.40); (2) within types of elephant-related damage, tolerance is lowest for crop loss and cash crop loss, followed by loss of working time and risk of human injury, while tolerance is relatively higher for damage to houses and property, loss of stored food, and damage to vehicles; (3) farm households showed low levels of tolerance across the dimensions of economic loss, population size, spatial distance, and activity frequency; (4) higher tolerance is observed among male respondents, Dai farm households, those engaged in wildlife protection-related occupations, and households located in Pu'er City, and tolerance increased as cultivated land area decreased, household income increased, and agricultural dependence declined. These findings provide empirical evidence for understanding farm households' tolerance toward Asian elephants and offer policy insights for improving tolerance, optimizing human-elephant conflict (HEC) management, and promoting the social sustainability of human-elephant coexistence. The study also contributes China-based evidence to discussions on flagship species conservation and community coexistence under the SDG 15 and CBD frameworks.
Authors
- Jie Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4801-7162)
- Weiming Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7780-526X)
- Mengyuan Zhang
- Junfeng Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6555-8619)
- Yi Xie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-382X)
Institutions
- Beijing Forestry University (CN)
- Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
- Renmin University of China (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Animals
- Published
- 2026-04-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16081195
- Primary Topic
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
- National Social Science Fund of China