Lung cancer screening knowledge, opinions and attitudes among healthcare professionals in Estonia prior to national program initiation

Background: This study aimed to gain insight into the opinions and attitudes about, and potential barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening (LCS) among healthcare professionals in Estonia. It also aimed to determine knowledge gaps that could be addressed when planning next steps toward a national LCS program. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted in June to August 2023 among primary care providers (PCPs), pulmonologists, radiologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons in Estonia. Differences between PCPs and other specialists were analyzed with regard to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes toward LCS. Results: About 146 healthcare professionals responded, 57% were family physicians. Less than half of all respondents considered existing evidence or international recommendations sufficient to support national LCS implementation, with uncertainty higher among PCPs. Adjusted analyses revealed that the PCPs had substantially higher odds of responding "Do not know" concerning international recommendations (aOR 5.06; 95% CI 1.97-13.85), and were far less likely to agree to assigning main responsibility for LCS participation to family physicians (aOR 0.10; 95% CI 0.02-0.40). PCPs also demonstrated greater uncertainty about the costs and labor intensity in LCS. Conclusion: This study reveals substantial variation in LCS knowledge, attitudes, and certainty across healthcare profession(al)s, highlighting the need for targeted training. Although for most professionals the benefits of LCS outweigh potential harms, structural constraints and uncertainty should still be carefully considered. Despite limited generalizability, study findings support evidence-informed planning and have already been considered in the Estonian LCS pilot study, the first step toward a national LCS program.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of public health research
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036261439973
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lung cancer screening knowledge, opinions and attitudes among healthcare professionals in Estonia prior to national program initiation

Kadi Kallavus, Tanel Laisaar, Kaja-Triin Laisaar
Journal of public health research
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Lung cancer screening knowledge, opinions and attitudes among healthcare professionals in Estonia prior to national program initiation

Kadi Kallavus, Tanel Laisaar, Kaja-Triin Laisaar
article en

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to gain insight into the opinions and attitudes about, and potential barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening (LCS) among healthcare professionals in Estonia. It also aimed to determine knowledge gaps that could be addressed when planning next steps toward a national LCS program. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted in June to August 2023 among primary care providers (PCPs), pulmonologists, radiologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons in Estonia. Differences between PCPs and other specialists were analyzed with regard to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes toward LCS. Results: About 146 healthcare professionals responded, 57% were family physicians. Less than half of all respondents considered existing evidence or international recommendations sufficient to support national LCS implementation, with uncertainty higher among PCPs. Adjusted analyses revealed that the PCPs had substantially higher odds of responding "Do not know" concerning international recommendations (aOR 5.06; 95% CI 1.97-13.85), and were far less likely to agree to assigning main responsibility for LCS participation to family physicians (aOR 0.10; 95% CI 0.02-0.40). PCPs also demonstrated greater uncertainty about the costs and labor intensity in LCS. Conclusion: This study reveals substantial variation in LCS knowledge, attitudes, and certainty across healthcare profession(al)s, highlighting the need for targeted training. Although for most professionals the benefits of LCS outweigh potential harms, structural constraints and uncertainty should still be carefully considered. Despite limited generalizability, study findings support evidence-informed planning and have already been considered in the Estonian LCS pilot study, the first step toward a national LCS program.

Journal of public health researchVol. 15(2)
Tartu University Hospital (EE), University of Tartu (EE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.