Risky Drinking in Midlife Men: Insights From Australia's National Drug Strategy Household Survey

INTRODUCTION: Australian midlife men are more likely to drink exceeding Australia's Alcohol guidelines for adults compared to midlife women. Despite this, there is a paucity of research investigating the factors associated with risky drinking for midlife men to inform preventive health efforts. This study investigates these factors and how they differ between younger and older midlife men. METHODS: Secondary data analysis was conducted using the 2019 and 2022/23 waves of the National Drug Strategy Household Survey. Data for midlife men (aged 30-59 years, n = 6471) were analysed, comprising younger (aged 30-44 years, n = 3311) and older (45-59 years, n = 3160) midlife age groups. Associations between behavioural, psychological and demographic factors and risky drinking, and interactions with midlife age groups were examined using chi-square and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 42.9% of midlife men reported risky drinking. Past year tobacco (OR = 1.70, CI = 1.35-2.14) and illicit/non-medicinal drug use (OR = 3.54, CI = 2.92-4.31), residing in Rural/Remote/Regional locations (OR = 1.76, CI = 1.48-2.11), higher psychological distress scores (OR = 1.37, CI = 1.05-1.79), working managerial (OR = 1.48, CI = 1.14-1.91) or tech/trade (OR = 1.48, CI = 1.17-1.87) occupations, and higher household earnings (OR = 1.70, CI = 1.41-2.06) were all significantly associated with risky drinking. Greater psychological distress scores were significantly associated with risky drinking among younger (OR = 0.49, CI = 0.32-0.75), but not older midlife men, while being married/de facto relationship was significantly associated with risky drinking among older (OR = 1.55, CI = 1.01-2.39), but not younger midlife men. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study highlights a range of modifiable and non-modifiable factors that may inform the development of future preventive health policy and practise strategies for this high prevalence group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug and Alcohol Review
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70149
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risky Drinking in Midlife Men: Insights From Australia's National Drug Strategy Household Survey

Michael Livingston, Ashlea Bartram, Jacqueline Bowden, Nataly Bovopoulos et al.
Drug and Alcohol Review
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
article

Risky Drinking in Midlife Men: Insights From Australia's National Drug Strategy Household Survey

Michael Livingston, Ashlea Bartram, Jacqueline Bowden, Nataly Bovopoulos, Stefano Zaccagnini
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Australian midlife men are more likely to drink exceeding Australia's Alcohol guidelines for adults compared to midlife women. Despite this, there is a paucity of research investigating the factors associated with risky drinking for midlife men to inform preventive health efforts. This study investigates these factors and how they differ between younger and older midlife men. METHODS: Secondary data analysis was conducted using the 2019 and 2022/23 waves of the National Drug Strategy Household Survey. Data for midlife men (aged 30-59 years, n = 6471) were analysed, comprising younger (aged 30-44 years, n = 3311) and older (45-59 years, n = 3160) midlife age groups. Associations between behavioural, psychological and demographic factors and risky drinking, and interactions with midlife age groups were examined using chi-square and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 42.9% of midlife men reported risky drinking. Past year tobacco (OR = 1.70, CI = 1.35-2.14) and illicit/non-medicinal drug use (OR = 3.54, CI = 2.92-4.31), residing in Rural/Remote/Regional locations (OR = 1.76, CI = 1.48-2.11), higher psychological distress scores (OR = 1.37, CI = 1.05-1.79), working managerial (OR = 1.48, CI = 1.14-1.91) or tech/trade (OR = 1.48, CI = 1.17-1.87) occupations, and higher household earnings (OR = 1.70, CI = 1.41-2.06) were all significantly associated with risky drinking. Greater psychological distress scores were significantly associated with risky drinking among younger (OR = 0.49, CI = 0.32-0.75), but not older midlife men, while being married/de facto relationship was significantly associated with risky drinking among older (OR = 1.55, CI = 1.01-2.39), but not younger midlife men. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study highlights a range of modifiable and non-modifiable factors that may inform the development of future preventive health policy and practise strategies for this high prevalence group.

Drug and Alcohol ReviewVol. 45(4)
Flinders University (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Curtin University (AU), Alcohol and Drug Foundation (AU), Centre for Remote Health (AU), Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health (AU)
Alcohol and Drug Foundation, Flinders University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.