Factors influencing home dialysis choice in Scandinavia: a cross-sectional study

Home dialysis provides several advantages over in-center hemodialysis, yet its uptake remains limited. Understanding how patients and kidney professionals perceive home dialysis is key to improving access and support. The aim of this study was to identify factors influencing the choice of home dialysis and to examine potential differences in perceptions between patients with kidney failure and kidney professionals across countries. A cross-sectional study using mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was conducted. A digital survey, developed through eight workshops (2021–2023) with patients and kidney professionals, included both closed- and open-ended questions. The survey was distributed to patients with kidney failure and kidney professionals in Scandinavia. Quantitative data were analyzed using logistic regression adjusted for gender, age, and country, while qualitative responses underwent content analysis. The survey received responses from 269 patients and 185 professionals. Patients were predominantly male (57.3%, mean age 61.3), while professionals were mainly female (85.6%, mean age 49.4). Prior patient experience included PD in 179 (35.8%) and HHD in 66 (13.2%). Independence was identified as the top reason for choosing home dialysis, though many found the decision challenging. Patients cited barriers such as unclear reimbursement (OR = 0.29), limited technology (OR = 0.44), and poor communication tools (OR = 0.18). Professionals highlighted patient reluctance (OR = 7.29), relative involvement (OR = 7.54), social isolation (OR = 7.18), and unsuitable home environments (OR = 3.64). Qualitative responses highlighted the complexity of modality choice and illustrated differing perspectives between patients and professionals. Patients and professionals perceive distinct barriers to home dialysis. Tailored interventions addressing these differences are essential to improve the uptake of home dialysis in Scandinavia. NA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nephrology
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-04972-4
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing home dialysis choice in Scandinavia: a cross-sectional study

Kiana Kiani, Astrid Torbjørnsen, Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsen, Peter Forde Hougaard et al.
BMC Nephrology
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Factors influencing home dialysis choice in Scandinavia: a cross-sectional study

Kiana Kiani, Astrid Torbjørnsen, Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsen, Peter Forde Hougaard, Jeanette Finderup, Are Hugo Pripp, Beate Nygaard-Andersen, Axel Wolf
article en

Abstract

Home dialysis provides several advantages over in-center hemodialysis, yet its uptake remains limited. Understanding how patients and kidney professionals perceive home dialysis is key to improving access and support. The aim of this study was to identify factors influencing the choice of home dialysis and to examine potential differences in perceptions between patients with kidney failure and kidney professionals across countries. A cross-sectional study using mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was conducted. A digital survey, developed through eight workshops (2021–2023) with patients and kidney professionals, included both closed- and open-ended questions. The survey was distributed to patients with kidney failure and kidney professionals in Scandinavia. Quantitative data were analyzed using logistic regression adjusted for gender, age, and country, while qualitative responses underwent content analysis. The survey received responses from 269 patients and 185 professionals. Patients were predominantly male (57.3%, mean age 61.3), while professionals were mainly female (85.6%, mean age 49.4). Prior patient experience included PD in 179 (35.8%) and HHD in 66 (13.2%). Independence was identified as the top reason for choosing home dialysis, though many found the decision challenging. Patients cited barriers such as unclear reimbursement (OR = 0.29), limited technology (OR = 0.44), and poor communication tools (OR = 0.18). Professionals highlighted patient reluctance (OR = 7.29), relative involvement (OR = 7.54), social isolation (OR = 7.18), and unsuitable home environments (OR = 3.64). Qualitative responses highlighted the complexity of modality choice and illustrated differing perspectives between patients and professionals. Patients and professionals perceive distinct barriers to home dialysis. Tailored interventions addressing these differences are essential to improve the uptake of home dialysis in Scandinavia. NA.

BMC Nephrology
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Østfold University of Applied Sciences (NO), Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole (NO), Østfold Hospital Trust (NO), Universidad Metropolitana (PR), University of Gothenburg (SE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.