Computer-assisted cognitive training in children with developmental disorders: a scoping review of available tools, clinical targets, and evidence gaps

Background: Computerized cognitive training (CCT) is increasingly used in pediatric rehabilitation; however, its application across developmental disorders remains heterogeneous in terms of targets, delivery models, and outcomes. This scoping review aimed to map the currently available CCT tools used in children with developmental disorders and to summarize their main characteristics, clinical targets, and evidence gaps. Methods: We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR framework and registered the protocol on the Open Science Framework (OSF; DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/9XQ5H). We searched peer-reviewed studies investigating CCT in children with developmental disorders and extracted data on device characteristics, target domains, training modalities, study design, and main findings. Results: Twenty-two studies describing 21 devices were included. Evidence was heterogeneous across diagnoses, intervention architectures, comparators, and outcome measures. The most consistent signal emerged in ADHD, where some programs reported improvements in working memory and selected executive-function outcomes. Evidence in learning-related and intellectual developmental conditions was more variable and device-specific, while the only ASD study identified did not show superiority over mock training. Discussion: CCT appears clinically attractive because of its adaptability, gamified delivery, and potential for home-based use; however, the current evidence base is uneven and does not support broad efficacy claims across developmental disorders. More disorder-specific studies with stronger comparators and ecologically valid outcomes are needed. Systematic Review Registration: https://osf.io/9xq5h, doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/9XQ5H.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2026.1764054
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computer-assisted cognitive training in children with developmental disorders: a scoping review of available tools, clinical targets, and evidence gaps

Giovanni Morone, Fulvia Di Iulio, Irene Ciancarelli, Alessandra Benenati et al.
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
article

Computer-assisted cognitive training in children with developmental disorders: a scoping review of available tools, clinical targets, and evidence gaps

Giovanni Morone, Fulvia Di Iulio, Irene Ciancarelli, Alessandra Benenati, Marco Iosa, Maria Grazia Maggio, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, Paolina Ettorre
article en

Abstract

Background: Computerized cognitive training (CCT) is increasingly used in pediatric rehabilitation; however, its application across developmental disorders remains heterogeneous in terms of targets, delivery models, and outcomes. This scoping review aimed to map the currently available CCT tools used in children with developmental disorders and to summarize their main characteristics, clinical targets, and evidence gaps. Methods: We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR framework and registered the protocol on the Open Science Framework (OSF; DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/9XQ5H). We searched peer-reviewed studies investigating CCT in children with developmental disorders and extracted data on device characteristics, target domains, training modalities, study design, and main findings. Results: Twenty-two studies describing 21 devices were included. Evidence was heterogeneous across diagnoses, intervention architectures, comparators, and outcome measures. The most consistent signal emerged in ADHD, where some programs reported improvements in working memory and selected executive-function outcomes. Evidence in learning-related and intellectual developmental conditions was more variable and device-specific, while the only ASD study identified did not show superiority over mock training. Discussion: CCT appears clinically attractive because of its adaptability, gamified delivery, and potential for home-based use; however, the current evidence base is uneven and does not support broad efficacy claims across developmental disorders. More disorder-specific studies with stronger comparators and ecologically valid outcomes are needed. Systematic Review Registration: https://osf.io/9xq5h, doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/9XQ5H.

Frontiers in PediatricsVol. 14
University of L'Aquila (IT), Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT), Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.