Mutagenic and carcinogenic potency determinations for NDMA support the cumulative dose assumption underpinning the less-than-lifetime Threshold of Toxicological Concern

The management of N-nitrosamine impurities challenges pharmaceutical development and regulation worldwide. Because most medicinal exposures are shorter than lifetime and absolute impurity exclusion is impossible, reliable approaches to define duration-specific intake limits are essential. On the premise that carcinogenic risk is proportional to cumulative dose, the 'Less-Than-Lifetime' (LTL) Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) framework defines progressively lower intake limits for mutagenic impurities over longer exposures. However, N-nitrosamines are currently treated as a 'cohort of concern', necessitating compound-specific evaluation placing reliance on in vivo mutagenicity assays for impurity qualifications. To better understand durational potency relationships and the application domain of the LTL-TTC, we applied benchmark dose (BMD) modelling to cumulative-dose-scaled transgenic rodent (TGR), error-corrected sequencing and rodent carcinogenicity datasets for N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) obtained from the published literature. For TGR, cumulative-dose scaling better resolved liver as the most sensitive organ and reduced interstudy variability: liver BMDs spanned ~ 80-fold in daily-dose units but only ~ 20-fold when scaled to cumulative dose. Among closely-matched mouse liver gavage studies, cumulative-dose BMDs only varied by ~ 2.5-fold across 1 to 28-day treatment regimens. Error-corrected sequencing also demonstrated parity, with acute-dose regimens producing mutation burdens near-identical (< 1.2-fold) to those cumulated from 28-day repeat-dose regimens. Comparable results were obtained from carcinogenicity datasets confirming proportionality-of-effect to cumulative dose. These findings empirically support the validity of the LTL-TTC concept. More broadly, they demonstrate that short-term in vivo mutagenicity assays can serve as reliable surrogates for lifetime carcinogenicity studies, strengthening the scientific and regulatory basis for duration-adjusted acceptable intakes for N-nitrosamine impurities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Toxicology
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-026-04385-0
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mutagenic and carcinogenic potency determinations for NDMA support the cumulative dose assumption underpinning the less-than-lifetime Threshold of Toxicological Concern

John W. Wills, Anthony M. Lynch, James S Harvey, Danielle S. G. Harte et al.
Archives of Toxicology
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
article

Mutagenic and carcinogenic potency determinations for NDMA support the cumulative dose assumption underpinning the less-than-lifetime Threshold of Toxicological Concern

John W. Wills, Anthony M. Lynch, James S Harvey, Danielle S. G. Harte, Ruby Buckley, Angela White
article en

Abstract

The management of N-nitrosamine impurities challenges pharmaceutical development and regulation worldwide. Because most medicinal exposures are shorter than lifetime and absolute impurity exclusion is impossible, reliable approaches to define duration-specific intake limits are essential. On the premise that carcinogenic risk is proportional to cumulative dose, the 'Less-Than-Lifetime' (LTL) Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) framework defines progressively lower intake limits for mutagenic impurities over longer exposures. However, N-nitrosamines are currently treated as a 'cohort of concern', necessitating compound-specific evaluation placing reliance on in vivo mutagenicity assays for impurity qualifications. To better understand durational potency relationships and the application domain of the LTL-TTC, we applied benchmark dose (BMD) modelling to cumulative-dose-scaled transgenic rodent (TGR), error-corrected sequencing and rodent carcinogenicity datasets for N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) obtained from the published literature. For TGR, cumulative-dose scaling better resolved liver as the most sensitive organ and reduced interstudy variability: liver BMDs spanned ~ 80-fold in daily-dose units but only ~ 20-fold when scaled to cumulative dose. Among closely-matched mouse liver gavage studies, cumulative-dose BMDs only varied by ~ 2.5-fold across 1 to 28-day treatment regimens. Error-corrected sequencing also demonstrated parity, with acute-dose regimens producing mutation burdens near-identical (< 1.2-fold) to those cumulated from 28-day repeat-dose regimens. Comparable results were obtained from carcinogenicity datasets confirming proportionality-of-effect to cumulative dose. These findings empirically support the validity of the LTL-TTC concept. More broadly, they demonstrate that short-term in vivo mutagenicity assays can serve as reliable surrogates for lifetime carcinogenicity studies, strengthening the scientific and regulatory basis for duration-adjusted acceptable intakes for N-nitrosamine impurities.

Archives of Toxicology
Age UK (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.