AI-Powered Knowledge Management Systems Across Industries: A Systematic Review of Applications, Implementation Barriers, and Ethical Challenges

This systematic literature review (SLR) evaluates the existing literature on the benefits, implementation challenges, and ethical concerns associated with Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) across industries. The SLR followed PRISMA guidelines to identify studies from Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, and Google Scholar, using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists were used to assess methodological quality and risk of bias in the included studies, and a structured narrative synthesis was employed to synthesize the findings. The review of 21 articles reveals benefits like improved knowledge capture and creation, storage, retrieval, personalization, and efficient dissemination, which lead to effective decision-making and performance improvements. The implementation barriers are categorized as organizational, technological, ethical, and financial, which generate a lack of trust, inability to manage, lack of interoperability, and monetary constraints. These barriers can be overcome by adopting Kotters’ Eight Stage Change Model, developing interoperability frameworks, evolving ethics benchmarks and standard guidelines for governance, and using viability analyses that incorporate both financial and non-financial considerations. In addition to bridging the gap between AI and KMS theories, the paper also provides practical and actionable insights about managing implementation and governance challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info17040369
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Powered Knowledge Management Systems Across Industries: A Systematic Review of Applications, Implementation Barriers, and Ethical Challenges

Edmund Evangelista, Ghazala Rizvi
Information
Knowledge Management and Technology
article

AI-Powered Knowledge Management Systems Across Industries: A Systematic Review of Applications, Implementation Barriers, and Ethical Challenges

Edmund Evangelista, Ghazala Rizvi
article en

Abstract

This systematic literature review (SLR) evaluates the existing literature on the benefits, implementation challenges, and ethical concerns associated with Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) across industries. The SLR followed PRISMA guidelines to identify studies from Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, and Google Scholar, using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists were used to assess methodological quality and risk of bias in the included studies, and a structured narrative synthesis was employed to synthesize the findings. The review of 21 articles reveals benefits like improved knowledge capture and creation, storage, retrieval, personalization, and efficient dissemination, which lead to effective decision-making and performance improvements. The implementation barriers are categorized as organizational, technological, ethical, and financial, which generate a lack of trust, inability to manage, lack of interoperability, and monetary constraints. These barriers can be overcome by adopting Kotters’ Eight Stage Change Model, developing interoperability frameworks, evolving ethics benchmarks and standard guidelines for governance, and using viability analyses that incorporate both financial and non-financial considerations. In addition to bridging the gap between AI and KMS theories, the paper also provides practical and actionable insights about managing implementation and governance challenges.

InformationVol. 17(4)
Kanya Maha Vidyalaya (IN), Zayed University (AE)
Zayed University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Knowledge Management and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.