Quantitative analysis of channel characteristics of distributive fluvial systems

ABSTRACT Distributive fluvial systems (DFSs) are characterised by a radial distributive channel pattern in planform and dominate modern‐day sedimentary basins. Where aggradation occurs, such as in sedimentary basins, there is increased preservation potential, and therefore, DFSs are hypothesised to constitute a significant portion of the continental fluvial rock record. However, despite their prevalence, channel characteristic variations longitudinally and between different climates are yet to be fully investigated. This study quantifies and analyses five representative DFSs across different climate zones: Río Fragua Chorroso (Colombia, tropical), Canning (Alaska, polar), Nabesna (Alaska, continental), Brahmaputra (India, subtropical) and an Unnamed Iranian DFS (Iran, dryland). The analysis quantifies downstream changes in channel belt and active channel widths (wetted channel/dry riverbed), and the proportion of bars present at the system, domain (proximal, medial and distal) and reach scales. For each DFS, 10 m Sentinel‐2 imagery was digitised to map channel belt, active channels and barforms (vegetated and non‐vegetated). Images were acquired between 2019 and 2021 across different seasons, which may influence the temporal variability of bar and channel configurations observed in each DFS. Analysis of channel belt width shows that three of the five DFSs (Río Fragua Chorroso, Nabesna and Unnamed Iranian) exhibit downstream decreases, whilst two DFSs (Brahmaputra and Canning) show contrasting downstream increases. Bars occupy more area than active channels in the proximal domain of all five DFSs and decrease in prevalence downstream, whilst vegetated and unvegetated bar complexes vary across all five DFSs. This analysis provides a comprehensive dataset to refine the DFS conceptual model and aid in the identification and characterisation of fluvial deposits across different climates. The findings also explain why some DFS do not conform to current models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sedimentology
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.70105
Primary Topic
Geological formations and processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative analysis of channel characteristics of distributive fluvial systems

Tobias James Scott Dalton, R Williams, Amanda Owen, Richard Boothroyd et al.
Sedimentology
Geological formations and processes
article

Quantitative analysis of channel characteristics of distributive fluvial systems

Tobias James Scott Dalton, R Williams, Amanda Owen, Richard Boothroyd, Kwetishe Joro Danjuma
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Distributive fluvial systems (DFSs) are characterised by a radial distributive channel pattern in planform and dominate modern‐day sedimentary basins. Where aggradation occurs, such as in sedimentary basins, there is increased preservation potential, and therefore, DFSs are hypothesised to constitute a significant portion of the continental fluvial rock record. However, despite their prevalence, channel characteristic variations longitudinally and between different climates are yet to be fully investigated. This study quantifies and analyses five representative DFSs across different climate zones: Río Fragua Chorroso (Colombia, tropical), Canning (Alaska, polar), Nabesna (Alaska, continental), Brahmaputra (India, subtropical) and an Unnamed Iranian DFS (Iran, dryland). The analysis quantifies downstream changes in channel belt and active channel widths (wetted channel/dry riverbed), and the proportion of bars present at the system, domain (proximal, medial and distal) and reach scales. For each DFS, 10 m Sentinel‐2 imagery was digitised to map channel belt, active channels and barforms (vegetated and non‐vegetated). Images were acquired between 2019 and 2021 across different seasons, which may influence the temporal variability of bar and channel configurations observed in each DFS. Analysis of channel belt width shows that three of the five DFSs (Río Fragua Chorroso, Nabesna and Unnamed Iranian) exhibit downstream decreases, whilst two DFSs (Brahmaputra and Canning) show contrasting downstream increases. Bars occupy more area than active channels in the proximal domain of all five DFSs and decrease in prevalence downstream, whilst vegetated and unvegetated bar complexes vary across all five DFSs. This analysis provides a comprehensive dataset to refine the DFS conceptual model and aid in the identification and characterisation of fluvial deposits across different climates. The findings also explain why some DFS do not conform to current models.

Sedimentology
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Clinical Trials New Zealand (NZ), University of Glasgow (GB)
Petroleum Technology Development Fund
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Geological formations and processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.