Identification of silage bacterial clusters and analysis of their microecological characteristics

BACKGROUND: Enterotypes refer to the different bacterial clusters in the gut microecosystem, which are closely related to host physiology, digestion, disease, and other phenotypes. However, whether there are clear clusters in the silage microecosystem, and the fermentation quality and characteristics of unique cluster silage remain unknown. To determine whether distinct bacterial clusters exist in the silage microecosystem and to characterize their fermentation properties, we analyzed the bacterial community composition and fermentation quality of 156 silage samples, and further explored their underlying microbial ecological features. RESULTS: We confirmed three distinct clusters in the silage microbiome, which were named according to their dominant bacterial taxa: the E-cluster (characterized by a higher abundance of unclassified Enterobacteriaceae (UG)), the P-cluster (enriched with Pseudomonas and Janthinobacterium), and the L-cluster (dominated by Lactobacillus). These microbial clusters were closely associated with fermentation quality: the L-cluster exhibited superior silage quality compared to the E- and P-clusters. Meanwhile, the microbial functional profiles differed significantly among the three clusters of silage. Numerous pathways were significantly enriched in the P-cluster, such as the Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, etc. Moreover, bacterial co-occurrence networks of three clusters silage displayed cooperative interactions mainly, P-cluster silage network was more complex and tighter, E-cluster silage has more functional microbial units and more stable. Furthermore, the assembly of microbial communities in the three silage clusters was dominated by stochastic processes. Specifically, the E-cluster and L-cluster were governed by ecological drift, while dispersal limitation was more influential in the P-cluster. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found in our study that the silage microbiome can be divided into three clusters, and different clusters have significant differences in fermentation quality, microbial diversity and compositions, functional profiles, microbial network characteristics and community assembly mechanisms. These results could broaden our comprehension of the silage microbial ecology processes and also provide a scientific basis on which to develop a method to precisely regulate silage quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Microbiome
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-026-00891-x
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of silage bacterial clusters and analysis of their microecological characteristics

Xuejuan Zi, Shuo Wu, Mao Li
Environmental Microbiome
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Identification of silage bacterial clusters and analysis of their microecological characteristics

Xuejuan Zi, Shuo Wu, Mao Li
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enterotypes refer to the different bacterial clusters in the gut microecosystem, which are closely related to host physiology, digestion, disease, and other phenotypes. However, whether there are clear clusters in the silage microecosystem, and the fermentation quality and characteristics of unique cluster silage remain unknown. To determine whether distinct bacterial clusters exist in the silage microecosystem and to characterize their fermentation properties, we analyzed the bacterial community composition and fermentation quality of 156 silage samples, and further explored their underlying microbial ecological features. RESULTS: We confirmed three distinct clusters in the silage microbiome, which were named according to their dominant bacterial taxa: the E-cluster (characterized by a higher abundance of unclassified Enterobacteriaceae (UG)), the P-cluster (enriched with Pseudomonas and Janthinobacterium), and the L-cluster (dominated by Lactobacillus). These microbial clusters were closely associated with fermentation quality: the L-cluster exhibited superior silage quality compared to the E- and P-clusters. Meanwhile, the microbial functional profiles differed significantly among the three clusters of silage. Numerous pathways were significantly enriched in the P-cluster, such as the Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, etc. Moreover, bacterial co-occurrence networks of three clusters silage displayed cooperative interactions mainly, P-cluster silage network was more complex and tighter, E-cluster silage has more functional microbial units and more stable. Furthermore, the assembly of microbial communities in the three silage clusters was dominated by stochastic processes. Specifically, the E-cluster and L-cluster were governed by ecological drift, while dispersal limitation was more influential in the P-cluster. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found in our study that the silage microbiome can be divided into three clusters, and different clusters have significant differences in fermentation quality, microbial diversity and compositions, functional profiles, microbial network characteristics and community assembly mechanisms. These results could broaden our comprehension of the silage microbial ecology processes and also provide a scientific basis on which to develop a method to precisely regulate silage quality.

Environmental Microbiome
Tropical Crops Genetic Resources Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.