Sovereignty-Preserving AI Systems and Mechanisms: A Survey

This record contains a working-paper version of “Sovereignty-Preserving AI Systems and Mechanisms: A Survey.” The paper surveys technical and institutional mechanisms for preserving meaningful human and institutional control in AI-mediated environments. It organizes the literature across five layers of dependence: data, learning, action, exit, and ecosystem capacity. Mechanisms reviewed include on-device inference, federated adaptation, bounded agent architectures, machine unlearning, auditability, substitutability, and public compute. Using shared dimensions such as locality, participation in improvement, boundedness, reversibility, substitutability, and public verifiability, the survey argues that contemporary AI redistributes control across multiple technical boundaries rather than along a single axis such as safety or privacy. The resulting framework is intended to support the design and evaluation of governable AI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19561631
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sovereignty-Preserving AI Systems and Mechanisms: A Survey

Qingfeng Liu
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Sovereignty-Preserving AI Systems and Mechanisms: A Survey

Qingfeng Liu
article en

Abstract

This record contains a working-paper version of “Sovereignty-Preserving AI Systems and Mechanisms: A Survey.” The paper surveys technical and institutional mechanisms for preserving meaningful human and institutional control in AI-mediated environments. It organizes the literature across five layers of dependence: data, learning, action, exit, and ecosystem capacity. Mechanisms reviewed include on-device inference, federated adaptation, bounded agent architectures, machine unlearning, auditability, substitutability, and public compute. Using shared dimensions such as locality, participation in improvement, boundedness, reversibility, substitutability, and public verifiability, the survey argues that contemporary AI redistributes control across multiple technical boundaries rather than along a single axis such as safety or privacy. The resulting framework is intended to support the design and evaluation of governable AI systems.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Hosei University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.