Engine, Rules, and Canon: An Architecture for User-Owned, Continuously Iterating AI Agents

We present Polybrain, an AI agent architecture organized around a single invariant — engine(rules) → results — in which a domain-agnostic engine applies user-owned declarative rules to produce disposable, re-derivable results over an append-only, user-owned substrate we name the canon. A continuously iterating kernel tuned by two orthogonal dials maximizes the time derivative of a scalar canon-trustworthiness measure we call NetTrust. A four-primitive deterministic witness stack composes into a categorical five-label verdict; a four-predicate publisher test governs consumer views; a coherence web forces CHALLENGED verdicts on contested claims; and self-modification is gated by the system's own verification. We ground the architecture in three theoretical commitments: a Bateson-style type-token separation, a three-primitive minimality identifying observe, decide, and remember as the minimum operator set for a canon-keeping learner, and a four-plane Structural Role Separation. We formalize a Reviewer-Correlation Ceiling Hypothesis stating that transformer-based reviewer ensembles asymptote near the Landis-Koch substantial-agreement band because of correlated errors inherited from shared pre-training substrate. We preregister a matched-paper evaluation protocol for the hypothesis, committing publicly to the sampling frame, composite weights, reviewer pools, analysis script, and stopping rule before any data is collected. The preregistration includes the required structurally non-transformer reviewer channel that the hypothesis demands for a falsification test. The executed result will be released as a separate Zenodo deposit on a distinct concept DOI, citing this paper as the preregistration of record. A contradiction of the hypothesis will be reported with equal weight to a confirmation. A reference implementation exists in the private polylogicai/polybrain repository with an honest disclosure of scope in §11. License: CC BY 4.0. Companion repository: github.com/polylogicai/polybrain-paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19571657
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engine, Rules, and Canon: An Architecture for User-Owned, Continuously Iterating AI Agents

Andrew Salvo
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Engine, Rules, and Canon: An Architecture for User-Owned, Continuously Iterating AI Agents

Andrew Salvo
article en

Abstract

We present Polybrain, an AI agent architecture organized around a single invariant — engine(rules) → results — in which a domain-agnostic engine applies user-owned declarative rules to produce disposable, re-derivable results over an append-only, user-owned substrate we name the canon. A continuously iterating kernel tuned by two orthogonal dials maximizes the time derivative of a scalar canon-trustworthiness measure we call NetTrust. A four-primitive deterministic witness stack composes into a categorical five-label verdict; a four-predicate publisher test governs consumer views; a coherence web forces CHALLENGED verdicts on contested claims; and self-modification is gated by the system's own verification. We ground the architecture in three theoretical commitments: a Bateson-style type-token separation, a three-primitive minimality identifying observe, decide, and remember as the minimum operator set for a canon-keeping learner, and a four-plane Structural Role Separation. We formalize a Reviewer-Correlation Ceiling Hypothesis stating that transformer-based reviewer ensembles asymptote near the Landis-Koch substantial-agreement band because of correlated errors inherited from shared pre-training substrate. We preregister a matched-paper evaluation protocol for the hypothesis, committing publicly to the sampling frame, composite weights, reviewer pools, analysis script, and stopping rule before any data is collected. The preregistration includes the required structurally non-transformer reviewer channel that the hypothesis demands for a falsification test. The executed result will be released as a separate Zenodo deposit on a distinct concept DOI, citing this paper as the preregistration of record. A contradiction of the hypothesis will be reported with equal weight to a confirmation. A reference implementation exists in the private polylogicai/polybrain repository with an honest disclosure of scope in §11. License: CC BY 4.0. Companion repository: github.com/polylogicai/polybrain-paper.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.