From calibrated risk to actionable response: A prescriptive analytics pipeline for urban flash floods

Urban flash-flood management requires turning probabilistic forecasts into concrete, resource-constrained actions. We develop a forecast-to-decision pipeline that links calibrated incident-level harm prediction with prescriptive optimization. Using a processed DesignSafe-CI Texas flash-flood incident dataset covering 2005–2019 (6,137 incidents; 2.17% harm prevalence), we construct GIS-derived predictors of hazard intensity, exposure, and transportation infrastructure, plus physically motivated interactions (e.g., precipitation × bridge density). An ℓ 1 -regularized logistic model (LASSO) with out-of-fold isotonic calibration provides decision-grade probabilities and automatic feature selection. Temporal generalization is assessed with a strict year holdout (train 2005-2018; test 2019), leave-one-year-out (LOYO), and rolling-origin schemes. On the 2019 holdout, the calibrated model attains ROC-AUC 0.783, PR-AUC 0.127 (about six times prevalence), and Brier 0.021, although the holdout contains only five positive cases and therefore yields wide uncertainty intervals; complementary LOYO validation gives AUC values spanning 0.66–0.99, reflecting interannual variability that random splits obscure. We embed the learned calibrator as a piecewise-linear mapping in a mixed-integer program that selects intervention sets meeting risk-coverage targets at minimum effort. Results show strong spatial concentration of expected harm within the candidate set of historically active locations: intervening at 61 of 220 candidate assets (28%) captures 80% of baseline risk; 98 candidate assets (45%) achieve 90%, with certified optimality gaps < 0.1%. Leave-one-year-out frontier analysis confirms this concentration pattern is stable across years (median: 27% of assets for 80% coverage; IQR < 2 percentage points), indicating that the prescriptive conclusions are not artifacts of the single holdout year. The framework is reproducible, interpretable, and operationally tractable, providing a transparent pathway from geomatics-informed risk to prioritized preparedness and response portfolios for known high-risk locations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resilient Cities and Structures
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2026.03.005
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From calibrated risk to actionable response: A prescriptive analytics pipeline for urban flash floods

Himadri Sen Gupta, Arko Gupta, Md Shoaib Mahmud
Resilient Cities and Structures
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

From calibrated risk to actionable response: A prescriptive analytics pipeline for urban flash floods

Himadri Sen Gupta, Arko Gupta, Md Shoaib Mahmud
article en

Abstract

Urban flash-flood management requires turning probabilistic forecasts into concrete, resource-constrained actions. We develop a forecast-to-decision pipeline that links calibrated incident-level harm prediction with prescriptive optimization. Using a processed DesignSafe-CI Texas flash-flood incident dataset covering 2005–2019 (6,137 incidents; 2.17% harm prevalence), we construct GIS-derived predictors of hazard intensity, exposure, and transportation infrastructure, plus physically motivated interactions (e.g., precipitation × bridge density). An ℓ 1 -regularized logistic model (LASSO) with out-of-fold isotonic calibration provides decision-grade probabilities and automatic feature selection. Temporal generalization is assessed with a strict year holdout (train 2005-2018; test 2019), leave-one-year-out (LOYO), and rolling-origin schemes. On the 2019 holdout, the calibrated model attains ROC-AUC 0.783, PR-AUC 0.127 (about six times prevalence), and Brier 0.021, although the holdout contains only five positive cases and therefore yields wide uncertainty intervals; complementary LOYO validation gives AUC values spanning 0.66–0.99, reflecting interannual variability that random splits obscure. We embed the learned calibrator as a piecewise-linear mapping in a mixed-integer program that selects intervention sets meeting risk-coverage targets at minimum effort. Results show strong spatial concentration of expected harm within the candidate set of historically active locations: intervening at 61 of 220 candidate assets (28%) captures 80% of baseline risk; 98 candidate assets (45%) achieve 90%, with certified optimality gaps < 0.1%. Leave-one-year-out frontier analysis confirms this concentration pattern is stable across years (median: 27% of assets for 80% coverage; IQR < 2 percentage points), indicating that the prescriptive conclusions are not artifacts of the single holdout year. The framework is reproducible, interpretable, and operationally tractable, providing a transparent pathway from geomatics-informed risk to prioritized preparedness and response portfolios for known high-risk locations.

Resilient Cities and StructuresVol. 5(2)
Colorado State University Pueblo (US), Khulna University of Engineering and Technology (BD)
Colorado State University
Climate action, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.