The determinants of transaction costs for carbon sequestration projects: a meta-analytical review

Carbon sequestration is suggested as a cost-effective strategy for climate mitigation. However, transaction costs (TRCs) for carbon sequestration projects, that is, the costs of establishment, management, compliance with trading requirements, and monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV), are often overlooked. The purpose of this study is to investigate the determinants of TRCs in forest carbon sequestration projects through a meta-regression analysis. This study finds 31 peer-reviewed papers published from 2000 to 2022 in international journals and with sufficient information about TRCs and project contexts. The studies report TRCs that vary from <0.1 to 1,084.6 US$/tCO2e, with a median of 1.1 US$/tCO2e, and a couple of high-end outliers. This study explores the role of determinants of reported TRCs in terms of project characteristics, policy instrument applied, institutional context, methods used and TRC categories considered. Results reveal that overall TRCs increase proportionally with the amount of carbon sequestered. The findings further suggest that projects generating offset credits or receiving payments for ecosystem services, exhibit about 16 and 4 times higher TRCs, respectively, than projects not tied to specific policy instruments. Moreover, studies only reporting a single TRC category show systematically lower costs, raising concerns for the use of such studies in a real-world policy context due to the risk of TRCs being underestimated.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfe-11-2024-0054
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The determinants of transaction costs for carbon sequestration projects: a meta-analytical review

Shiyu Yan, Katarina Elofsson, Luiza Martins Karpavicius
Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)
Forest Management and Policy
article

The determinants of transaction costs for carbon sequestration projects: a meta-analytical review

Shiyu Yan, Katarina Elofsson, Luiza Martins Karpavicius
article en

Abstract

Carbon sequestration is suggested as a cost-effective strategy for climate mitigation. However, transaction costs (TRCs) for carbon sequestration projects, that is, the costs of establishment, management, compliance with trading requirements, and monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV), are often overlooked. The purpose of this study is to investigate the determinants of TRCs in forest carbon sequestration projects through a meta-regression analysis. This study finds 31 peer-reviewed papers published from 2000 to 2022 in international journals and with sufficient information about TRCs and project contexts. The studies report TRCs that vary from <0.1 to 1,084.6 US$/tCO2e, with a median of 1.1 US$/tCO2e, and a couple of high-end outliers. This study explores the role of determinants of reported TRCs in terms of project characteristics, policy instrument applied, institutional context, methods used and TRC categories considered. Results reveal that overall TRCs increase proportionally with the amount of carbon sequestered. The findings further suggest that projects generating offset credits or receiving payments for ecosystem services, exhibit about 16 and 4 times higher TRCs, respectively, than projects not tied to specific policy instruments. Moreover, studies only reporting a single TRC category show systematically lower costs, raising concerns for the use of such studies in a real-world policy context due to the risk of TRCs being underestimated.

Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.