MANAGING THE INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS BASED ON DIGITAL MATURITY ASSESSMENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MODERN CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES AND MODELS

The article examines contemporary conceptual approaches to managing the innovative development of organizational systems based on the assessment of digital maturity. The aim of the project is to identify the theoretical foundations for the development of the author's conceptual framework of dynamic digital resilience, focused on the tasks of public administration in the emergency response system.The main task is to compare modern conceptual approaches and models on the project topic developed by researchers from countries with different levels and quality of public administration, which suggests the possibility of developing an author's model of dynamic digital resilience.Methodology. The principles of systematic and comparative approaches are used, qualitative analysis and theoretical generalization are carried out. The presented analytical review of the scientific literature confirms the increasing attention of both domestic and foreign researchers to the formation of an appropriate conceptual framework for the study of dynamic digital resistance. Results. The transition from the paradigm of digital transformation as a set of technological projects to the paradigm of digital maturity as a managerial capability of organizational systems to ensure resilience, controllability, and adaptability under conditions of permanent digital turbulence is substantiated. Based on a comparative analysis of digital maturity models developed in the BRICS+ countries and corporate frameworks of developed markets (USA), key differences in conceptual emphases are identified: technology-centric corporate models are contrasted with institutionally oriented, infrastructure-capability-based, and platform-inclusive approaches. It is shown that for public sector organizations and systems with a high cost of managerial error, digital maturity cannot be reduced to the level of technological adoption and requires alignment of technological solutions with regulatory frameworks of responsibility, managerial competencies, and the resilience of basic infrastructure. The findings provide theoretical grounds for the development of an authorial conceptual framework of dynamic digital resilience oriented toward public administration and emergency response systems.