Different strokes: changing identities and connectivity between Iron Age Ireland and Northern Britain

The rich decoration of Irish and British Iron Age metalwork once conveyed complex symbolic meanings, though its language has long since been lost. Ornamentation remains a vital avenue for interpreting the identities of both makers and users. While most Irish Iron Age artefacts adhere to the insular La Tène-derived style, a small yet significant group of objects diverges markedly in decorative character. These items, distributed across several centuries, suggest the persistence of an alternative, yet possibly connected, tradition. This paper proposes that this distinct style may reflect the material culture of a group who perceived themselves as culturally separate. Their divergent aesthetic choices may signal a long-lived identity expressed through decoration and may have influenced the later development of Pictish art in northern Britain. Through close analysis of these underexplored objects, this study contributes to broader discussions of cultural plurality, identity construction and artistic exchange in Iron Age Ireland, Britain and Europe and the role of decorative traditions in shaping and reflecting social difference.<br/><br/>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeological Journal
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2026.2644670
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Different strokes: changing identities and connectivity between Iron Age Ireland and Northern Britain

Rena Maguire
Archaeological Journal
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
article

Different strokes: changing identities and connectivity between Iron Age Ireland and Northern Britain

Rena Maguire
article en

Abstract

The rich decoration of Irish and British Iron Age metalwork once conveyed complex symbolic meanings, though its language has long since been lost. Ornamentation remains a vital avenue for interpreting the identities of both makers and users. While most Irish Iron Age artefacts adhere to the insular La Tène-derived style, a small yet significant group of objects diverges markedly in decorative character. These items, distributed across several centuries, suggest the persistence of an alternative, yet possibly connected, tradition. This paper proposes that this distinct style may reflect the material culture of a group who perceived themselves as culturally separate. Their divergent aesthetic choices may signal a long-lived identity expressed through decoration and may have influenced the later development of Pictish art in northern Britain. Through close analysis of these underexplored objects, this study contributes to broader discussions of cultural plurality, identity construction and artistic exchange in Iron Age Ireland, Britain and Europe and the role of decorative traditions in shaping and reflecting social difference.<br/><br/>

Archaeological Journal
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of Limerick (IE)
Irish Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.