Comparative Study of ICL V4c Decentration in Vertical vs Horizontal Implantation: Association with Angle Alpha and Validation of Equivalent Visual Quality

Purpose: To compare the decentration of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) V4c and its impact on visual quality between vertical and horizontal implantation techniques. Methods: 50 patients (80 eyes) were assigned to horizontal (40 eyes) or vertical (40 eyes) implantation groups. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative evaluations included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive status, corneal topography, and wavefront aberration analysis. Decentration was measured using the OPD-Scan III aberrometer, compared between implantation methods, and analyzed for associations with preoperative angles α and κ. Results: At 6 months, 100% of horizontal and 97.5% of vertical implantation eyes achieved UDVA ≥ 20/20, with all eyes maintaining or improving CDVA. Mean decentration was similar between groups (horizontal: 0.42 ± 0.18 mm; vertical: 0.42 ± 0.19 mm; p = 0.915), with temporal displacement predominating. Angle α significantly correlated with decentration in both groups (p = 0.016; p = 0.017), while angle κ showed no association (p > 0.05). The change of higher-order aberrations did not differ between groups (p > 0.05), and decentration magnitude did not clinically affect optical quality (p > 0.05 for all aberration parameters). Conclusion: Vertical and horizontal ICL V4c implantation demonstrated comparable centration and visual outcomes. Decentration was significantly associated with preoperative angle α, underscoring the clinical importance of angle α assessment for optimal ICL positioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical ophthalmology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s581238
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of ICL V4c Decentration in Vertical vs Horizontal Implantation: Association with Angle Alpha and Validation of Equivalent Visual Quality

Zhongjun Tang, Shengtao Liu, Linda Zheng, Xingtao Zhou et al.
Clinical ophthalmology
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Comparative Study of ICL V4c Decentration in Vertical vs Horizontal Implantation: Association with Angle Alpha and Validation of Equivalent Visual Quality

Zhongjun Tang, Shengtao Liu, Linda Zheng, Xingtao Zhou, Ziyi Guo, Zhuotong Wu
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the decentration of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) V4c and its impact on visual quality between vertical and horizontal implantation techniques. Methods: 50 patients (80 eyes) were assigned to horizontal (40 eyes) or vertical (40 eyes) implantation groups. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative evaluations included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive status, corneal topography, and wavefront aberration analysis. Decentration was measured using the OPD-Scan III aberrometer, compared between implantation methods, and analyzed for associations with preoperative angles α and κ. Results: At 6 months, 100% of horizontal and 97.5% of vertical implantation eyes achieved UDVA ≥ 20/20, with all eyes maintaining or improving CDVA. Mean decentration was similar between groups (horizontal: 0.42 ± 0.18 mm; vertical: 0.42 ± 0.19 mm; p = 0.915), with temporal displacement predominating. Angle α significantly correlated with decentration in both groups (p = 0.016; p = 0.017), while angle κ showed no association (p > 0.05). The change of higher-order aberrations did not differ between groups (p > 0.05), and decentration magnitude did not clinically affect optical quality (p > 0.05 for all aberration parameters). Conclusion: Vertical and horizontal ICL V4c implantation demonstrated comparable centration and visual outcomes. Decentration was significantly associated with preoperative angle α, underscoring the clinical importance of angle α assessment for optimal ICL positioning.

Clinical ophthalmologyVol. Volume 20
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Fudan University (CN), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Sydney Hospital (AU), Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University (CN), Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University (CN)
Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.