Anisotropic Hot Spot Formation at a Grain Boundary in Shock-Compressed TATB High Explosive Crystal

Secondary high explosives (HEs) exhibit rich microstructure that promotes the formation of hot spots responsible for detonation initiation, but the role of microstructural interfaces remains poorly quantified. To this end, we develop extensions for the generalized crystal-cutting method (GCCM) to prepare molecular dynamics (MD) simulation cells containing grain boundaries (GBs) and other crystal-crystal interfaces with prescribed tilt and twist orientations. Using the GCCM, we perform MD simulations of shock interactions with a GB between the (001) and (100) crystal facets in the secondary HE TATB (1,3,5-triamino-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene). Our MD simulations reveal a strong directional dependence to the formation of a hot spot at the GB interface. In particular, transmission of the shock from the (001) grain to the (100) grain yields a hot spot in the (100) grain at the GB interface, whereas no hot spot is produced when an equivalent shock transits the GB in the opposite direction. We trace the origin of this GB anisotropy to three dominant factors: (1) the intrinsic differences in shock-deformation mechanisms and wave structures for the bulk (100) and (001) grains, which leads to distinct geometries and mechanical impedances upon shock arrival to the GB depending on which grains are donor or acceptor for the transmitted shock; (2) the different time intervals separating the initial shock rise and the formation of steady wave structures in the respective donor-acceptor configurations; and (3) the differences in time scales required to re-establish local thermal equilibrium. Interfacial hot spots form when these factors combine to impede development of a steady two-wave structure and instead induce a localized, pseudosingly shocked region that undergoes a higher rate of work production (resulting in a higher temperature) compared to when the steady two-wave structure develops further from the interface. The extensions to the GCCM approach presented here are anticipated to facilitate a wide range of MD studies that focus on understanding the role of crystal-crystal interfaces in molecular materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6c00496
Primary Topic
Energetic Materials and Combustion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anisotropic Hot Spot Formation at a Grain Boundary in Shock-Compressed TATB High Explosive Crystal

Matthew P. Kroonblawd, Nithin Mathew, Edward M. Kober, Shan Jiang et al.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Energetic Materials and Combustion
article

Anisotropic Hot Spot Formation at a Grain Boundary in Shock-Compressed TATB High Explosive Crystal

Matthew P. Kroonblawd, Nithin Mathew, Edward M. Kober, Shan Jiang, Tommy Sewell, Puhan Zhao
article en

Abstract

Secondary high explosives (HEs) exhibit rich microstructure that promotes the formation of hot spots responsible for detonation initiation, but the role of microstructural interfaces remains poorly quantified. To this end, we develop extensions for the generalized crystal-cutting method (GCCM) to prepare molecular dynamics (MD) simulation cells containing grain boundaries (GBs) and other crystal-crystal interfaces with prescribed tilt and twist orientations. Using the GCCM, we perform MD simulations of shock interactions with a GB between the (001) and (100) crystal facets in the secondary HE TATB (1,3,5-triamino-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene). Our MD simulations reveal a strong directional dependence to the formation of a hot spot at the GB interface. In particular, transmission of the shock from the (001) grain to the (100) grain yields a hot spot in the (100) grain at the GB interface, whereas no hot spot is produced when an equivalent shock transits the GB in the opposite direction. We trace the origin of this GB anisotropy to three dominant factors: (1) the intrinsic differences in shock-deformation mechanisms and wave structures for the bulk (100) and (001) grains, which leads to distinct geometries and mechanical impedances upon shock arrival to the GB depending on which grains are donor or acceptor for the transmitted shock; (2) the different time intervals separating the initial shock rise and the formation of steady wave structures in the respective donor-acceptor configurations; and (3) the differences in time scales required to re-establish local thermal equilibrium. Interfacial hot spots form when these factors combine to impede development of a steady two-wave structure and instead induce a localized, pseudosingly shocked region that undergoes a higher rate of work production (resulting in a higher temperature) compared to when the steady two-wave structure develops further from the interface. The extensions to the GCCM approach presented here are anticipated to facilitate a wide range of MD studies that focus on understanding the role of crystal-crystal interfaces in molecular materials.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry CVol. 130(16)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), George Washington University (US), University of Washington (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Mississippi (US), Division of Materials Science and Engineering (AU), Computational Physics (United States) (US), Center for Clinical Research (United States) (US), University of Missouri (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Energetic Materials and Combustion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.