Validation of Predictive Equations for Estimating Lean Soft Tissue and Fat-Free Mass in Class II–V Obesity: A Multicenter Observational Study with Implications for Bariatric Surgery Monitoring

Background: Preoperative analysis of body composition is critical for anticipating metabolic changes and optimizing weight loss outcomes after bariatric surgery (BS). This study aimed to assess agreement between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived fat-free mass (FFM) and lean soft tissue (LST) and estimates from anthropometric equations in individuals with class II obesity or greater. Methods: LST and FFM were measured via DXA in 123 participants with class II obesity or greater. Measurements were performed before and approximately 1 month after BS. Six equations were used to estimate FFM and five to estimate LST. The estimates were calculated at both time points, and changes from pre- to post-BS were compared with the DXA-derived values. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate differences between the predicted and measured values. Results: At the group level, equation for higher body mass index (BMI) values demonstrated the highest agreement with DXA-FFM before surgery (mean difference, 0.01 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.74 to 0.74), whereas equation for normal BMI values showed the greatest agreement at follow-up (mean difference, 1.71 kg; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.13). For LST estimation, equation provided the greatest accuracy before BS (mean difference, 0.03 kg; 95% CI, -1.35 to 1.40), and equation achieved the best performance in capturing group-level changes during follow-up (mean difference, 0.48 kg; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.92). Conclusion: Although certain predictive equations yielded acceptable agreement with DXA at the group level, their performance was inconsistent at the individual level, limiting their clinical utility. Further research is warranted to develop predictive models with enhanced precision and reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7570/jomes25065
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of Predictive Equations for Estimating Lean Soft Tissue and Fat-Free Mass in Class II–V Obesity: A Multicenter Observational Study with Implications for Bariatric Surgery Monitoring

Ana Moradell, Gabriel Lozano‐Berges, Armando Raimundo, Lucas Veras et al.
Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Validation of Predictive Equations for Estimating Lean Soft Tissue and Fat-Free Mass in Class II–V Obesity: A Multicenter Observational Study with Implications for Bariatric Surgery Monitoring

Ana Moradell, Gabriel Lozano‐Berges, Armando Raimundo, Lucas Veras, Ángel Lanas, Ángel Matute-Llorente, Gonzalo Hijos, Marta Sánchez‐Luengo, Susana Ara-Gimeno, José A. Casajús, Alejandro Gómez-Bruton, Hélder Fonseca, Manuel Carvalho, Pilar Irún, Cláudia Mendes, German Vicente-Rodríguez, Jorge Bravo, Maria Jose Palacios Fanlo
article en

Abstract

Background: Preoperative analysis of body composition is critical for anticipating metabolic changes and optimizing weight loss outcomes after bariatric surgery (BS). This study aimed to assess agreement between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived fat-free mass (FFM) and lean soft tissue (LST) and estimates from anthropometric equations in individuals with class II obesity or greater. Methods: LST and FFM were measured via DXA in 123 participants with class II obesity or greater. Measurements were performed before and approximately 1 month after BS. Six equations were used to estimate FFM and five to estimate LST. The estimates were calculated at both time points, and changes from pre- to post-BS were compared with the DXA-derived values. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate differences between the predicted and measured values. Results: At the group level, equation for higher body mass index (BMI) values demonstrated the highest agreement with DXA-FFM before surgery (mean difference, 0.01 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.74 to 0.74), whereas equation for normal BMI values showed the greatest agreement at follow-up (mean difference, 1.71 kg; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.13). For LST estimation, equation provided the greatest accuracy before BS (mean difference, 0.03 kg; 95% CI, -1.35 to 1.40), and equation achieved the best performance in capturing group-level changes during follow-up (mean difference, 0.48 kg; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.92). Conclusion: Although certain predictive equations yielded acceptable agreement with DXA at the group level, their performance was inconsistent at the individual level, limiting their clinical utility. Further research is warranted to develop predictive models with enhanced precision and reliability.

Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome
Universidade do Porto (PT), University of Évora (PT), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Hospital do Espírito Santo (PT), Spanish Clinical Research Network (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (ES), i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto (PT), Ordem dos Médicos (PT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.