Is it safe to vape? Assessing the carcinogenic risk of “vape smoke”

Vaping was introduced as a means of quitting smoking by slowly reducing nicotine dose to wean smokers of their carcinogenic habit. In this setting the risks of vaping likely outweigh the benefits of eliminating the carcinogenic risk associated with smoking cigarettes. Soon after the introduction of vaping it caught on as a trendy alternative to smoking, particularly among young people. This means that the risk-benefit profile changed considerably because the benefit of smoking cessation was no longer part of the risk-benefit equation. Since vaping has now become a primary means of taking nicotine, a risk assessment of vaping per se is necessary to determine its potential effects on vapers' health. In this viewpoint, we use our knowledge of the chemistry of the production of "vape smoke" to identify its key toxic components. Then, using published animal toxicity data for these chemicals and estimates of vapers' exposure levels, we assess the magnitude of carcinogenic risk. We conclude that vaping is carcinogenic, but that the risk is likely lower than for smoking cigarettes. Therefore, someone taking up vaping not as a tool for smoking cessation is adding carcinogenic risk to their daily risk profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Medical Journal
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7434
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is it safe to vape? Assessing the carcinogenic risk of “vape smoke”

Jacob Liddle, Ashleigh Woollett, Madison Kennedy, Ian Shaw et al.
New Zealand Medical Journal
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Is it safe to vape? Assessing the carcinogenic risk of “vape smoke”

Jacob Liddle, Ashleigh Woollett, Madison Kennedy, Ian Shaw, Leila Nolan, Megan Rawlins, Natasha Dickie
article en

Abstract

Vaping was introduced as a means of quitting smoking by slowly reducing nicotine dose to wean smokers of their carcinogenic habit. In this setting the risks of vaping likely outweigh the benefits of eliminating the carcinogenic risk associated with smoking cigarettes. Soon after the introduction of vaping it caught on as a trendy alternative to smoking, particularly among young people. This means that the risk-benefit profile changed considerably because the benefit of smoking cessation was no longer part of the risk-benefit equation. Since vaping has now become a primary means of taking nicotine, a risk assessment of vaping per se is necessary to determine its potential effects on vapers' health. In this viewpoint, we use our knowledge of the chemistry of the production of "vape smoke" to identify its key toxic components. Then, using published animal toxicity data for these chemicals and estimates of vapers' exposure levels, we assess the magnitude of carcinogenic risk. We conclude that vaping is carcinogenic, but that the risk is likely lower than for smoking cigarettes. Therefore, someone taking up vaping not as a tool for smoking cessation is adding carcinogenic risk to their daily risk profile.

New Zealand Medical JournalVol. 139(1633)
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.