Linguistic validation and reliability of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (COMPASS 31)

The Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (COMPASS-31) is a validated self-report questionnaire designed to assess autonomic symptoms across six domains. A Brazilian Portuguese version has not yet been formally validated. Following a standardized Mayo Clinic linguistic validation protocol, the COMPASS-31 was translated into Brazilian Portuguese. Twenty-one patients with disorders associated with autonomic symptoms and nine healthy controls completed both the English and Portuguese versions in randomized order, with a six-week interval between administrations. Reliability was assessed using kappa coefficients and Bland–Altman analysis. Validity was evaluated by comparing scores between patients and controls and by correlating the Portuguese and English versions. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the COMPASS-31 demonstrated good test–retest reliability and a strong correlation with the original English version (r = 0.784, p < 0.0001). Patients exhibited significantly higher total scores than healthy controls. Bland–Altman analysis showed good agreement, with 93.4% of values falling within the limits of agreement. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the COMPASS-31 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing autonomic symptoms in both clinical and research settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurological Sciences
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-026-09039-8
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linguistic validation and reliability of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (COMPASS 31)

Robert Schleip, Marcelo Faria Silva, Fabiana C. da Silva, Wolfgang Singer et al.
Neurological Sciences
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Linguistic validation and reliability of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (COMPASS 31)

Robert Schleip, Marcelo Faria Silva, Fabiana C. da Silva, Wolfgang Singer, Ronaldo H. Cruvinel-Júnior, Maíra D. Correia
article en

Abstract

The Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (COMPASS-31) is a validated self-report questionnaire designed to assess autonomic symptoms across six domains. A Brazilian Portuguese version has not yet been formally validated. Following a standardized Mayo Clinic linguistic validation protocol, the COMPASS-31 was translated into Brazilian Portuguese. Twenty-one patients with disorders associated with autonomic symptoms and nine healthy controls completed both the English and Portuguese versions in randomized order, with a six-week interval between administrations. Reliability was assessed using kappa coefficients and Bland–Altman analysis. Validity was evaluated by comparing scores between patients and controls and by correlating the Portuguese and English versions. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the COMPASS-31 demonstrated good test–retest reliability and a strong correlation with the original English version (r = 0.784, p < 0.0001). Patients exhibited significantly higher total scores than healthy controls. Bland–Altman analysis showed good agreement, with 93.4% of values falling within the limits of agreement. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the COMPASS-31 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing autonomic symptoms in both clinical and research settings.

Neurological SciencesVol. 47(5)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universität Ulm (DE), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Diploma Hochschule (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Technische Universität München
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.