Selecting Employees Who Protect and Promote the Well‐Being of Others: Commentary on König et al. (2026)

ABSTRACT In their “Provocation Article,” König et al. (2026) argue for well‐being as an explicit criterion in personnel selection and propose selecting for applicants with characteristics predictive of well‐being. We argue that if the goal is safeguarding employee well‐being, selecting for characteristics predictive of others' well‐being is far more critical than those predictive of one's own well‐being. We believe that safeguarding others' well‐being is applicable to all employees, not just leaders, and that there are other types of interpersonal conduct beyond organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs) that can affect others' psychological safety, trust, and sense of belonging and should be examined. We conclude with recommendations for implementing selection for those who will protect and promote the well‐being of others and the long‐term benefits of this emphasis for worker growth and development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.70064
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selecting Employees Who Protect and Promote the Well‐Being of Others: Commentary on König et al. (2026)

Louis Tay, Gloria Liou
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

Selecting Employees Who Protect and Promote the Well‐Being of Others: Commentary on König et al. (2026)

Louis Tay, Gloria Liou
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In their “Provocation Article,” König et al. (2026) argue for well‐being as an explicit criterion in personnel selection and propose selecting for applicants with characteristics predictive of well‐being. We argue that if the goal is safeguarding employee well‐being, selecting for characteristics predictive of others' well‐being is far more critical than those predictive of one's own well‐being. We believe that safeguarding others' well‐being is applicable to all employees, not just leaders, and that there are other types of interpersonal conduct beyond organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs) that can affect others' psychological safety, trust, and sense of belonging and should be examined. We conclude with recommendations for implementing selection for those who will protect and promote the well‐being of others and the long‐term benefits of this emphasis for worker growth and development.

International Journal of Selection and AssessmentVol. 34(2)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.