Cloud Outsourcing Risk Management for Cloud Consumers: A Systematic Literature Review

This systematic literature review explores the landscape of risks and risk management techniques in cloud outsourcing, with a focus on assisting enterprise cloud consumers in understanding and mitigating both technical and non-technical risks, despite having limited control over the infrastructures. From a comprehensive analysis of 55 academic articles, spanning the period from January 2013 to September 2022, we identify and characterize risks using established frameworks from ENISA and [20]. Using ISO31000 and the classification proposed by [4], we also summarize and characterize 23 main strategies in risk management techniques feasible for cloud consumers, including technical and non-technical measures. We observe a significant emphasis on technical risks in the literature, while non-technical risks, including legal, organizational, and policy aspects, are relatively underrepresented. Threats to data confidentiality dominate the technical risks and mostly originate from shared infrastructure issues. However, non-technical issues, such as vendor lock-in, also pose catastrophic risks the continuity and business operations of the cloud consumers. We also observe that encryption still plays a key role in the existing techniques, next to other techniques such as auditing, risk-aware software development, and assessments of third parties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Computing Surveys
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3808691
Primary Topic
Cloud Data Security Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cloud Outsourcing Risk Management for Cloud Consumers: A Systematic Literature Review

Muhammad Yasir Muzayan Haq, L.J.M. Nieuwenhuis, Abhishta Abhishta, Siraj Anand
ACM Computing Surveys
Cloud Data Security Solutions
article

Cloud Outsourcing Risk Management for Cloud Consumers: A Systematic Literature Review

Muhammad Yasir Muzayan Haq, L.J.M. Nieuwenhuis, Abhishta Abhishta, Siraj Anand
article en

Abstract

This systematic literature review explores the landscape of risks and risk management techniques in cloud outsourcing, with a focus on assisting enterprise cloud consumers in understanding and mitigating both technical and non-technical risks, despite having limited control over the infrastructures. From a comprehensive analysis of 55 academic articles, spanning the period from January 2013 to September 2022, we identify and characterize risks using established frameworks from ENISA and [20]. Using ISO31000 and the classification proposed by [4], we also summarize and characterize 23 main strategies in risk management techniques feasible for cloud consumers, including technical and non-technical measures. We observe a significant emphasis on technical risks in the literature, while non-technical risks, including legal, organizational, and policy aspects, are relatively underrepresented. Threats to data confidentiality dominate the technical risks and mostly originate from shared infrastructure issues. However, non-technical issues, such as vendor lock-in, also pose catastrophic risks the continuity and business operations of the cloud consumers. We also observe that encryption still plays a key role in the existing techniques, next to other techniques such as auditing, risk-aware software development, and assessments of third parties.

ACM Computing Surveys
University of Twente (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cloud Data Security Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.