Early Identification of Gastrostomy Tube Placement in the Surgical Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on optimal timing or indications for gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement for Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients. While avoiding procedural risks for many, a reactive-only approach has been linked to longer hospital stays, higher costs, and complications related to prolonged hospitalization for some patients. The aim of this study was to identify patients at risk of gastrostomy during the primary hospitalization. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent HNC resection and reconstruction at a single academic institution (2017-2022) was completed. Statistical analysis was performed with Stata. RESULTS: Across 145 patients, tumor site [55% oral, 6% oropharynx, 7% hypopharynx, 31% larynx] significantly influenced G-tube placement (p < 0.0005). The following were independently associated with reactive G-tube placement: sex (females, HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.01-3.23), tumor site (oropharynx 2.42, 95% 1.29-4.54; larynx 0.16, 95% 0.07-0.36), and prior systemic therapy (0.22, 95% 0.05-0.96); which were used to create a nomogram for patient counseling. CONCLUSIONS: Presurgical risk stratification offers a value-based approach for identifying HNC patients most likely to require G-tube placement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Head & Neck
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.70282
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Identification of Gastrostomy Tube Placement in the Surgical Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

Victoria I. Fonseca, Makayla R. Matthews, Jason Tasoulas, Trevor G. Hackman
Head & Neck
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

Early Identification of Gastrostomy Tube Placement in the Surgical Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

Victoria I. Fonseca, Makayla R. Matthews, Jason Tasoulas, Trevor G. Hackman
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on optimal timing or indications for gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement for Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients. While avoiding procedural risks for many, a reactive-only approach has been linked to longer hospital stays, higher costs, and complications related to prolonged hospitalization for some patients. The aim of this study was to identify patients at risk of gastrostomy during the primary hospitalization. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent HNC resection and reconstruction at a single academic institution (2017-2022) was completed. Statistical analysis was performed with Stata. RESULTS: Across 145 patients, tumor site [55% oral, 6% oropharynx, 7% hypopharynx, 31% larynx] significantly influenced G-tube placement (p < 0.0005). The following were independently associated with reactive G-tube placement: sex (females, HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.01-3.23), tumor site (oropharynx 2.42, 95% 1.29-4.54; larynx 0.16, 95% 0.07-0.36), and prior systemic therapy (0.22, 95% 0.05-0.96); which were used to create a nomogram for patient counseling. CONCLUSIONS: Presurgical risk stratification offers a value-based approach for identifying HNC patients most likely to require G-tube placement.

Head & Neck
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.